Re‐viewing performance: Showing eye‐tracking data as feedback to improve performance monitoring in a complex visual task.

Background: Performance monitoring plays a key role in self‐regulated learning, but is difficult, especially for complex visual tasks such as navigational map reading. Gaze displays (i.e. visualizations of participants' eye movements during a task) might serve as feedback to improve students' perfor...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Journal of Computer Assisted Learning Vol. 38; no. 4; pp. 1087 - 1102
Autores principales: Kok, Ellen, Hormann, Olle, Rou, Jeroen, van Saase, Evi, van der Schaaf, Marieke, Kester, Liesbeth, van Gog, Tamara
Formato: pictorial research tables/charts randomized controlled trial Journal Article
Publicado: Wiley-Blackwell Aug2022
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=157845807&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 157845807
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        02664909
        6M1
      jtl: Journal of Computer Assisted Learning
      issn: 02664909
      maglogo: Y
    pubinfo:
      dt: Aug2022
      vid: 38
      iid: 4
      pid: 480
      pub: Wiley-Blackwell
      place: Malden, Massachusetts
    artinfo:
      ui:
        157845807
        155826354
        157845807
        157845807
        10.1111/jcal.12666
        157845807
      ppf: 1087
      ppct: 15
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: Re‐viewing performance: Showing eye‐tracking data as feedback to improve performance monitoring in a complex visual task.
      aug:
        au:
          Kok, Ellen
          Hormann, Olle
          Rou, Jeroen
          van Saase, Evi
          van der Schaaf, Marieke
          Kester, Liesbeth
          van Gog, Tamara
        affil: Department of Education, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
      sug:
        subj:
          Eye Movement Measurements
          Feedback
          Task Performance and Analysis Evaluation
          Eye Movements
          Memory
          Human
          Education, Masters
          Students, College
          Random Assignment
          Videorecording
          Maps Evaluation
          Data Analysis, Statistical
          Cues
          Study Design
          Male
          Female
          Adolescence
          Adult
          Software
          Student Knowledge
          Color Vision Defects
          Algorithms
          Calibration
          Analysis of Variance
          Data Analysis Software
          Mann-Whitney U Test
          T-Tests
          Bias (Research)
          Judgment
          Randomized Controlled Trials
          Adolescent: 13-18 years
          Adult: 19-44 years
          Male
          Female
      ab: Background: Performance monitoring plays a key role in self‐regulated learning, but is difficult, especially for complex visual tasks such as navigational map reading. Gaze displays (i.e. visualizations of participants' eye movements during a task) might serve as feedback to improve students' performance monitoring. Objectives: We hypothesized that participants who review their performance based on screen recordings that also display their gaze would have a higher monitoring accuracy and increase in post‐test performance and would remember more executed actions than participants who review based on a screen recording only (i.e. control condition). Methods: Sixty‐four higher education students were randomly assigned to a gaze‐display or control condition. After watching an instruction video, they practiced five navigational map‐reading tasks and then reviewed their performance while thinking aloud, either prompted by a screen recording with gaze display or a screen recording only. Before and after reviewing, participants estimated the number of correctly solved tasks and finally made a five‐item post‐test. Results and conclusions: Analyses with frequentist and Bayesian statistics showed that gaze displays did not improve monitoring accuracy (i.e. estimated minus actual performance), post‐test performance, or the number of reported actions. It is concluded that scanpath gaze displays do not provide useful cues to improve monitoring accuracy in this task. Takeaways: Gaze displays are a promising tool for education, but scanpath gaze displays did not help to enhance monitoring accuracy in a navigational map‐reading task. Lay description: What is currently known?: Monitoring performance is central in self‐regulated learning.Monitoring is often difficult for learners, in particular in complex visual tasks.Gaze displays visualize viewing behaviour that was measured with eye tracking.Gaze displays can improve task performance, but effects on monitoring are unknown. What does the paper add?: We expected gaze displays to help learners to monitor their performance on a map‐reading task.However, dynamic gaze displays did not help to improve monitoring accuracy in this study.Further research should investigate whether other types of gaze displays improve monitoring. Implications for practitioners: Eye tracking provides promising ways to support monitoring and learning.However, not all forms of using gaze displays enhance monitoring or learning.The specific implementation of gaze displays might matter.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        pictorial
        research
        tables/charts
        randomized controlled trial
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N