Deliberate reflection and clinical reasoning: Founding ideas and empirical findings.

Context: The idea that reflection improves reasoning and learning, since long present in other fields, emerged in the 90s in the medical education literature. Since then, the number of publications on reflection as a means to improve diagnostic learning and clinical problem‐solving has increased ste...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Medical Education Vol. 57; no. 1; pp. 76 - 86
Autores principales: Mamede, Sílvia, Schmidt, Henk G.
Formato: case study tables/charts Journal Article
Publicado: Wiley-Blackwell Jan2023
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=160717512&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 160717512
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        03080110
        ESF
      jtl: Medical Education
      issn: 03080110
      maglogo: Y
    pubinfo:
      dt: Jan2023
      vid: 57
      iid: 1
      pid: 480
      pub: Wiley-Blackwell
      place: Malden, Massachusetts
    artinfo:
      ui:
        160717512
        158028558
        160717512
        160717512
        10.1111/medu.14863
        160717512
      ppf: 76
      ppct: 10
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
      tig:
        atl: Deliberate reflection and clinical reasoning: Founding ideas and empirical findings.
      aug:
        au:
          Mamede, Sílvia
          Schmidt, Henk G.
        affil: Institute of Medical Education Research Rotterdam, Erasmus MC
      sug:
        subj:
          Reflection
          Diagnostic Reasoning
          Learning
          Philosophy
          Theory
          Treatment Errors
          Physicians
          Job Performance
          Students
          Male
          Middle Age
          Physical Examination
          Diagnostic Tests, Routine
          Cough
          Dyspnea
          Thorax Pathology
          Diagnosis, Differential
          Middle Aged: 45-64 years
          Male
      ab: Context: The idea that reflection improves reasoning and learning, since long present in other fields, emerged in the 90s in the medical education literature. Since then, the number of publications on reflection as a means to improve diagnostic learning and clinical problem‐solving has increased steeply. Recently, concerns with diagnostic errors have raised further interest in reflection. Several approaches based on reflection have been proposed to reduce clinicians' errors during diagnostic reasoning. What reflection entails varies substantially, and most approaches still require empirical examination. Purpose The present essay aims to help clarify the role of deliberate reflection in diagnostic reasoning. Deliberate reflection is an approach whose effects on diagnostic reasoning and learning have been empirically studied over the past 15 years. The philosophical roots of the approach will be briefly examined, and the theory and practice of deliberate reflection, particularly its effectiveness, will be reviewed. Lessons learned and unresolved issues will be discussed. Discussion The deliberate reflection approach originated from a conceptualization of the nature of reflection practice in medicine informed by Dewey's and Schön's work. The approach guides physicians through systematically reviewing the grounds of their initial diagnosis and considering alternatives. Experimental evidence has supported the effectiveness of deliberate reflection in increasing physicians' diagnostic performance, particularly in nonstraightforward diagnostic tasks. Deliberate reflection has also proved helpful to improve students' diagnostic learning and to facilitate learning of new information. The mechanisms behind the effects of deliberate reflection remain unclear. Tentative explanations focus on the activation/reorganisation of prior knowledge induced by deliberate reflection. Its usefulness depends therefore on the difficulty of the problem relative to the clinician's knowledge. Further research should examine variations in instructions on how to reflect upon a case, the value of further guidance while learning from deliberate reflection, and its benefits in real practice. The authors summarize the lessons learned from research on deliberate reflection, synthesizing its theory and practice, its effects on diagnostic performance and unresolved issues that demand further research.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        case study
        tables/charts
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N