Against Slagle's Reading of Eliminative Materialism on Self‐Defeating.

Jim Slagle claims that eliminative materialism (EM) denies some of the mind's self‐evident properties, such as intentionality, qualia and the view that beliefs are real or veridical. I, herein, will argue that what EM denies is actually the folk psychological notion of belief, not belief as such. Th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Philosophical Investigations Vol. 46; no. 1; pp. 99 - 112
Autor principal: Tümkaya, Serdal
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Wiley-Blackwell Jan2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=160765519&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 160765519
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        01900536
        BS4
      jtl: Philosophical Investigations
      issn: 01900536
      maglogo: Y
    pubinfo:
      dt: Jan2023
      vid: 46
      iid: 1
      pid: 480
      pub: Wiley-Blackwell
    artinfo:
      ui:
        160765519
        10.1111/phin.12351
      ppf: 99
      ppct: 13
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
              size: 107KB
      tig:
        atl: Against Slagle's Reading of Eliminative Materialism on Self‐Defeating.
      aug:
        au: Tümkaya, Serdal
        affil: Middle East Technical University
      su:
        Materialism
        Ethnopsychology
        Intentionality (Philosophy)
        Reading
      sug:
        subj:
          Materialism
          Ethnopsychology
          Intentionality (Philosophy)
          Reading
      ab: Jim Slagle claims that eliminative materialism (EM) denies some of the mind's self‐evident properties, such as intentionality, qualia and the view that beliefs are real or veridical. I, herein, will argue that what EM denies is actually the folk psychological notion of belief, not belief as such. The Churchlands construe propositional belief as merely one kind of representation in the larger representational scheme. The point here is not to deny belief, but to construe it as one of the, and possibly a very recent, sorts of representations that the brain uses, not the general or fundamental form thereof.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: Copyright of Philosophical Investigations is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.
      item: Philosophical Investigations
      holder: Wiley-Blackwell
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2023
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N