Collective practical knowledge is a fragmented interrogative capacity.
What does it take for a group of people to know how to do something? An account of collective practical knowledge ought to be compatible with the linguistic evidence about the semantics for collective knowledge‐how ascriptions, be able to explain the practicality of collective knowledge, be able to...
| Published in: | Philosophical Issues Vol. 32; no. 1; pp. 180 - 200 |
|---|---|
| Main Author: | |
| Format: | Article |
| Published: |
Wiley-Blackwell
Oct2022
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | View this record in EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=160783395&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: hlh uiTerm: 160783395 longDbName: Humanities International Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 15336077 1731 jtl: Philosophical Issues issn: 15336077 maglogo: Y pubinfo: dt: Oct2022 vid: 32 iid: 1 pid: 480 pub: Wiley-Blackwell artinfo: ui: 160783395 10.1111/phis.12219 ppf: 180 ppct: 20 formats: fmt: – @attributes: type: T – @attributes: type: P size: 390KB tig: atl: Collective practical knowledge is a fragmented interrogative capacity. aug: au: Habgood‐Coote, Joshua affil: University of Leeds, Leeds, UK su: Semantics Possibility Sharing sug: subj: Semantics Possibility Sharing ab: What does it take for a group of people to know how to do something? An account of collective practical knowledge ought to be compatible with the linguistic evidence about the semantics for collective knowledge‐how ascriptions, be able to explain the practicality of collective knowledge, be able to explain both the connection between individual and collective know‐how and the possibility of a group knowing how to do something none of its members know, and be applicable to a suitably wide range of groups. In this paper I develop a view which can meet all of these desiderata, which combines a Fragmented account of collective knowledge (Habgood‐Coote, 2019a), with the view that practical knowledge is an Interrogative Capacity (Habgood‐Coote, 2019b). pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: Y custom: Copyright of Philosophical Issues is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. item: Philosophical Issues holder: Wiley-Blackwell dt: @attributes: year: 2022 holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|