Responsible Dissemination in Sexual Orientation Research: The Case of the AI "Gaydar".
A recent controversy about neural networks allegedly capable of detecting a person's sexual orientation raises the question of whether all research on homosexuality should be permitted. This paper considers two arguments for limits to such research, and concludes that there are good reasons to limit...
| Publicado en: | Philosophy of Science Vol. 89; no. 5; pp. 1075 - 1085 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Cambridge University Press
Dec2022
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| Sumario: | A recent controversy about neural networks allegedly capable of detecting a person's sexual orientation raises the question of whether all research on homosexuality should be permitted. This paper considers two arguments for limits to such research, and concludes that there are good reasons to limit at least the dissemination of applied research on the etiology of homosexuality. The paper then briefly sketches how this could work, and looks at three objections against these limitations. |
|---|