Responsible Dissemination in Sexual Orientation Research: The Case of the AI "Gaydar".
A recent controversy about neural networks allegedly capable of detecting a person's sexual orientation raises the question of whether all research on homosexuality should be permitted. This paper considers two arguments for limits to such research, and concludes that there are good reasons to limit...
| Publicado en: | Philosophy of Science Vol. 89; no. 5; pp. 1075 - 1085 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Cambridge University Press
Dec2022
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=161723311&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: hlh uiTerm: 161723311 longDbName: Humanities International Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 00318248 PSC jtl: Philosophy of Science issn: 00318248 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Dec2022 vid: 89 iid: 5 pid: 15979 pub: Cambridge University Press artinfo: ui: 161723311 10.1017/psa.2022.44 ppf: 1075 ppct: 10 formats: fmt: – @attributes: type: T – @attributes: type: P size: 167KB tig: atl: Responsible Dissemination in Sexual Orientation Research: The Case of the AI "Gaydar". aug: au: De Block, Andreas Conix, Stijn affil: Centre for Logic and Philosophy of Science, Institute of Philosophy, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium su: Gay men Artificial intelligence Homosexuality sug: subj: Gay men Artificial intelligence Homosexuality ab: A recent controversy about neural networks allegedly capable of detecting a person's sexual orientation raises the question of whether all research on homosexuality should be permitted. This paper considers two arguments for limits to such research, and concludes that there are good reasons to limit at least the dissemination of applied research on the etiology of homosexuality. The paper then briefly sketches how this could work, and looks at three objections against these limitations. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: Y custom: Copyright of Philosophy of Science is the property of Cambridge University Press and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. item: Philosophy of Science holder: Cambridge University Press dt: @attributes: year: 2022 holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|