Antibiotic‐loaded bone substitutes therapy in the management of the moderate to severe diabetic foot infection: A meta‐analysis.

In recent years, local antibiotic‐loaded bone substitutes (ALBS) have been used increasingly in the treatment of diabetic foot infection (DFI). The meta‐analysis aimed to analyse the efficacy of ALBS on patients with moderate to severe DFI (with or without osteomyelitis). With an appropriate search...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Wound Repair & Regeneration Vol. 31; no. 2; pp. 205 - 227
Autores principales: Lin, Xinyi, Wu, Yan, Huang, Hong, Peng, Ruihan, Huang, FuHua, Hong, Lvrong, Chen, WenZhuan
Formato: meta analysis research systematic review tables/charts Journal Article
Publicado: Wiley-Blackwell Mar/Apr2023
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
Descripción
Sumario:In recent years, local antibiotic‐loaded bone substitutes (ALBS) have been used increasingly in the treatment of diabetic foot infection (DFI). The meta‐analysis aimed to analyse the efficacy of ALBS on patients with moderate to severe DFI (with or without osteomyelitis). With an appropriate search strategy, 7 studies were selected for analysis (2 RCTs and 5 cohort studies). The result showed that the application of ALBS effectively reduced the length of hospital stay (WMD −5.55; 95% CI: −9.85 to −1.26; P = 0.01), the recurrence rates (RR 0.33; 95% CI: 0.15 to 0.69; P = 0.003) and the mortality rates (RR 0.22; 95% CI: 0.06 to 0.82; P = 0.02). Compared to the control groups, however, there was no difference in healing rates (RR 1.06; 95% CI: 0.96 to 1.18; P = 0.26), healing time (WMD −1.44; 95% CI: −3.37 to −0.49; P = 0.14), the number of debridement (WMD −1.98; 95% CI: −4.08 to 0.12; P = 0.06) and major amputation rates (RR 0.76; 95% CI: 0.35 to 1.61; P = 0.47). The ALBS appears to have some beneficial effects as an adjunct to standard surgery in the treatment of DFI with or without osteomyelitis, as it reduces recurrence rates, mortality rates, and length of hospital stay, but there was no statistically significant difference in enhancing wound healing.