On Social Revolutions and Restorations in Modern History.

Sharp opposition between revolution as a positively valued and dominant term and restoration as its subordinated complement, loaded with negative meaning, is one of the legacies of the 1789 French Revolution. This may be the main reason why social restorations still are neglected in the philosophy o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Problems / Problemos pp. 36 - 44
Autor principal: Norkus, Zenonas
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Vilnius University 2022 Supplement
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=163399552&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 163399552
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        13921126
        3D4C
      jtl: Problems / Problemos
      issn: 13921126
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: 2022 Supplement
      pid: 16037
      pub: Vilnius University
    artinfo:
      ui:
        163399552
        10.15388/Problemos.Priedas.22.3
      ppf: 36
      ppct: 8
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
            size: 1.2MB
      tig:
        atl: On Social Revolutions and Restorations in Modern History.
      aug:
        au: Norkus, Zenonas
        affil: Institute of Sociology and Social Work Vilnius University.
      su:
        Social revolution
        Modern history
        Historical sociology
        Philosophy of history
        French Revolution, 1789-1799
      sug:
        subj:
          Social revolution
          Modern history
          Historical sociology
          Philosophy of history
          French Revolution, 1789-1799
      keyword:
        endurance success of restoration
        performance success of restoration
        social restorations
        token restorations
        type restorations
        realizacijos restauracija
        restauracijos trukmės sėkmė
        restauracijos veikmės sėkmė
        socialinės restauracijos
        tipo restauracija
      ab:
        Sharp opposition between revolution as a positively valued and dominant term and restoration as its subordinated complement, loaded with negative meaning, is one of the legacies of the 1789 French Revolution. This may be the main reason why social restorations still are neglected in the philosophy of history and historical sociology, although both types of modern revolutions (French 1789 or “bourgeois” and Russian 1917 or “socialist”) did end with restorations. This paper proposes revisions to only attempt at the theory of social restorations (by Austrian American comparativist Robert Kann (1906-1981) to make it applicable to post-communist restorations. They include the distinction between type and token restorations, endurance and performance success of restorations, and a new formulation of the criterion of endurance success.
        Griežta revoliucijos kaip pozityviai vertinamo bet dominuojančio termino, ir restauracijos kaip jos subordinuoto papildinio priešstata yra 1789 m. Prancūzijos revoliucijos dalis. Ji gali būti pagrindinė priežastis, kodėl istorijos filosofoja ir istorinė sociologija vis dar ignoruoja socialines restauracijas, nors abiejų tipų modernios revoliucijos (1789 m. Prancūzijos arba „buržuazinės“ ir 1917 m. Rusijos arba „socialistinės“) užsibaigė restauracijomis. Šiame straipsnyje pateikiamos pataisos kol kas vieninteliam bandymui išplėtoti socialinių restauracijų teoriją, kurios autorius yra austrų kilmės amerikiečių komparatyvistas Robertas Kannas (1906-1981), siekiant padaryti ją pritaikomą pokomunistinėms restauracijoms. Šios pataisos apima skirtį tarp tipo restauracijos ir realizacijos restauracijos bei skirtį tarp restauracijos trukmės sėkmės ir veikmės sėkmės, o taip pat naują trukmės sėkmės kriterijaus formuluotę.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: Copyright of Problems / Problemos is the property of Vilnius University and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.
      item: Problems / Problemos
      holder: Vilnius University
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2022
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N