Test–Retest Reliability and the Role of Task Instructions when Measuring Listening Effort Using a Verbal Response Time Paradigm.
Listening amidst competing noise taxes one's limited cognitive resources, leading to increased listening effort. As such, there is interest in incorporating a reliable test of listening effort into the clinical test battery. One clinically promising method for measuring listening effort is verbal re...
| Publicado en: | Seminars in Hearing Vol. 44; no. 2; pp. 140 - 155 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , , |
| Formato: | equations & formulas research tables/charts Journal Article |
| Publicado: |
Thieme Medical Publishing Inc.
May2023
|
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=163408671&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ccm uiTerm: 163408671 longDbName: CINAHL Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: dissinfo: jinfo: jid: 07340451 GQL jtl: Seminars in Hearing issn: 07340451 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: May2023 vid: 44 iid: 2 pid: 2811 pub: Thieme Medical Publishing Inc. place: New York, New York artinfo: ui: 163408671 163408671 163408671 10.1055/s-0043-1767667 163408671 ppf: 140 ppct: 15 formats: tig: atl: Test–Retest Reliability and the Role of Task Instructions when Measuring Listening Effort Using a Verbal Response Time Paradigm. aug: au: Gustafson, Samantha J. Ortiz, Crystal Nelson, Loren affil: Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah sug: subj: Listening Effort Evaluation Test-Retest Reliability Reaction Time Task Performance and Analysis Noise Human Pilot Studies Measurement Error Male Female Young Adult Scales Intraclass Correlation Coefficient Repeated Measures Analysis of Variance T-Tests Funding Source Male Female ab: Listening amidst competing noise taxes one's limited cognitive resources, leading to increased listening effort. As such, there is interest in incorporating a reliable test of listening effort into the clinical test battery. One clinically promising method for measuring listening effort is verbal response time (VRT) because it can be obtained using already-established clinical tasks. In order for widespread implementation of the VRT paradigm, a better understanding of the psychometric properties is needed. The purpose of this work was to improve the understanding of the reliability and sensitivity of the VRT listening task. Using within-subject study designs, we completed a pilot study to evaluate the test–retest reliability (Study 1) and the effects of task instructions and listening condition (Study 2). Preliminary results show that the VRT paradigm enjoys good to excellent test–retest reliability and that neither task instructions nor listening condition meaningfully influence VRT once measurement error is accounted for. Future studies should account for measurement error when considering statistically significant versus meaningful effects of experimental parameters when using listening effort tasks. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: equations & formulas research tables/charts Journal Article ougenre: Article language: English refInfo: holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|