Community Partnerships to Support Women of Color Breast Cancer Survivors.
Background: Social determinants of health, biological, genetic and environmental factors contribute to disparate outcomes for women of color breast cancer survivors. Objective: The purpose of this paper is to describe a Community Engaged Project that addressed unmet informational needs through educa...
| Publicado en: | ABNFF Journal Vol. 1; no. 3; pp. 61 - 69 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , |
| Formato: | Journal Article |
| Publicado: |
Association of Black Nursing Faculty Foundation
Dec2022
|
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=163654245&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ccm uiTerm: 163654245 longDbName: CINAHL Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: dissinfo: jinfo: jid: 30649927 N7JH jtl: ABNFF Journal issn: 30649927 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Dec2022 vid: 1 iid: 3 pid: 71817 pub: Association of Black Nursing Faculty Foundation place: Frederick, Maryland artinfo: ui: 163654245 163654245 ppf: 61 ppct: 8 formats: fmt: @attributes: type: P tig: atl: Community Partnerships to Support Women of Color Breast Cancer Survivors. aug: au: Knobf, M. Tish Erdos, Diane sug: ab: Background: Social determinants of health, biological, genetic and environmental factors contribute to disparate outcomes for women of color breast cancer survivors. Objective: The purpose of this paper is to describe a Community Engaged Project that addressed unmet informational needs through education and sharing and a collaborative process to build trust and problem solve toward a goal of improved breast cancer survivorship for women of color. Methods: An academic-community partnership was created with an advisory leadership group which led to four annual educational and interactive community partnership meetings. Findings: Participants (range 25-58 participants per meeting) reported high quality for educational presentations (81%-93%) and rated interactive sessions as excellent/very good (71%). The meetings were effective in stimulating ideas (71%), met the objective of connecting survivors (77%), identified strategies to overcome barriers to patient-centered survivorship care and recommendations to improve care and provided direction for research. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Journal Article ougenre: Article language: English refInfo: holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|