Hedged testimony.

Speakers offer testimony. They also hedge. This essay offers an account of how hedging makes a difference to testimony. Two components of testimony are considered: how testimony warrants a hearer's attitude, and how testimony changes a speaker's responsibilities. Starting with a norm-based approach...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Nous (0029-4624) Vol. 57; no. 2; pp. 341 - 370
Main Author: van Elswyk, Peter
Format: Article
Published: Wiley-Blackwell Jun2023
Online Access:View this record in EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=164546587&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 164546587
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00294624
        D97
      jtl: Nous (0029-4624)
      issn: 00294624
      maglogo: Y
    pubinfo:
      dt: Jun2023
      vid: 57
      iid: 2
      pid: 480
      pub: Wiley-Blackwell
    artinfo:
      ui:
        164546587
        10.1111/nous.12411
      ppf: 341
      ppct: 29
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
            size: 1.8MB
      tig:
        atl: Hedged testimony.
      aug:
        au: van Elswyk, Peter
        affil: University of Wisconsin--Milwaukee
      su: Social norms
      sug:
        subj: Social norms
      ab: Speakers offer testimony. They also hedge. This essay offers an account of how hedging makes a difference to testimony. Two components of testimony are considered: how testimony warrants a hearer's attitude, and how testimony changes a speaker's responsibilities. Starting with a norm-based approach to testimony where hearer's beliefs are prima faciewarranted because of social norms and speakers acquire responsibility from these same norms, I argue that hedging alters both components simultaneously. It changes which attitudes a hearer is prima facie warranted in forming in response to testimony, and reduces how much responsibility a speaker undertakes in testifying. A consequence of this account is that speakers who hedge merely for strategic purposes deprive their hearers of warrant for stronger doxastic attitudes.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: Copyright of Nous (0029-4624) is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.
      item: Nous (0029-4624)
      holder: Wiley-Blackwell
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2023
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N