Neural Machinery and Realization.

The view that the relationship between minds and brains can be thought of on the model of software and hardware is pervasive. The most common versions of the view, known as functionalism in philosophy of mind, hold that minds are realized by brains. The question arises, What is the realization relat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Philosophy of Science Vol. 71; no. 5; pp. 997 - 1007
Autor principal: Polger, Thomas W.
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Cambridge University Press Dec2004
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=16630059&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 16630059
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00318248
        PSC
      jtl: Philosophy of Science
      issn: 00318248
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Dec2004
      vid: 71
      iid: 5
      pid: 15979
      pub: Cambridge University Press
    artinfo:
      ui:
        16630059
        10.1086/425948
      ppf: 997
      ppct: 10
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
            size: 96KB
      tig:
        atl: Neural Machinery and Realization.
      aug:
        au: Polger, Thomas W.
        affil: Department of Philosophy, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, 45221-0374.
      su:
        Brain
        Philosophy of mind
        Cognitive science
        Metaphysics
        Mind & body
        Phenomenology
      sug:
        subj:
          Brain
          Philosophy of mind
          Cognitive science
          Metaphysics
          Mind & body
          Phenomenology
      ab: The view that the relationship between minds and brains can be thought of on the model of software and hardware is pervasive. The most common versions of the view, known as functionalism in philosophy of mind, hold that minds are realized by brains. The question arises, What is the realization relation? I approach the question of realization through a case study: David Marl s (1982) computational account of early visual processing. Marr's work is instructive because it is the textbook case of the hierarchy of mechanisms that has seemed to bear out the arguments of functionalist philosophers and cognitive scientists. I argue that realization as employed by Marr has some but not all of the characteristics that it is usually taken to have.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: Copyright of Philosophy of Science is the property of Cambridge University Press and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.
      item: Philosophy of Science
      holder: Cambridge University Press
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2004
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N