How to Conduct a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis: A Guide for Clinicians.
Evidence-based practice relies on using research evidence to guide clinical decision-making. However, staying current with all published research can be challenging. Many clinicians use review articles that apply predefined methods to locate, identify, and summarize all available evidence on a topic...
| Publicado en: | Respiratory Care Vol. 68; no. 9; pp. 1295 - 1309 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , |
| Formato: | tables/charts Journal Article |
| Publicado: |
Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.
Sep2023
|
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=171107912&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ccm uiTerm: 171107912 longDbName: CINAHL Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: dissinfo: jinfo: jid: 00201324 4GG jtl: Respiratory Care issn: 00201324 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Sep2023 vid: 68 iid: 9 pid: 1365 pub: Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. place: New Rochelle, New York artinfo: ui: 171107912 171107912 171107912 10.4187/respcare.10971 171107912 ppf: 1295 ppct: 14 formats: fmt: @attributes: type: P tig: atl: How to Conduct a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis: A Guide for Clinicians. aug: au: Zaccagnini, Marco Jie Li affil: School of Physical and Occupational Therapy, McGill University, Montréal, Québec, Canada sug: subj: Literature Review Scoping Review Systematic Review Meta Analysis Decision Making, Clinical Respiratory Care Practice Professional Practice, Research-Based Checklists Literature Searching Data Analysis ab: Evidence-based practice relies on using research evidence to guide clinical decision-making. However, staying current with all published research can be challenging. Many clinicians use review articles that apply predefined methods to locate, identify, and summarize all available evidence on a topic to guide clinical decision-making. This paper discusses the role of review articles, including narrative, scoping, and systematic reviews, to synthesize existing evidence and generate new knowledge. It provides a step-by-step guide to conducting a systematic review and meta-analysis, covering key steps such as formulating a research question, selecting studies, evaluating evidence quality, and reporting results. This paper is intended as a resource for clinicians looking to learn how to conduct systematic reviews and advance evidence-based practice in the field. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: tables/charts Journal Article ougenre: Article language: English refInfo: holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|