Does question order matter on online math assessments? A big data analysis of undergraduate mathematics final exams.

Background: The sudden growth in online instruction due to COVID‐19 restrictions has given renewed urgency to questions about remote learning that have remained unresolved. Web‐based assessment software provides instructors an array of options for varying testing parameters, but the pedagogical impa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Journal of Computer Assisted Learning Vol. 39; no. 5; pp. 1539 - 1553
Autores principales: Gruss, Richard, Clemons, Josh
Formato: equations & formulas pictorial research tables/charts Journal Article
Publicado: Wiley-Blackwell Oct2023
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=171903675&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 171903675
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        02664909
        6M1
      jtl: Journal of Computer Assisted Learning
      issn: 02664909
      maglogo: Y
    pubinfo:
      dt: Oct2023
      vid: 39
      iid: 5
      pid: 480
      pub: Wiley-Blackwell
      place: Malden, Massachusetts
    artinfo:
      ui:
        171903675
        163245126
        171903675
        171903675
        10.1111/jcal.12816
        171903675
      ppf: 1539
      ppct: 14
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: Does question order matter on online math assessments? A big data analysis of undergraduate mathematics final exams.
      aug:
        au:
          Gruss, Richard
          Clemons, Josh
        affil: Department of Management, Davis College of Business and Economics, Radford University, Radford Virginia,, USA
      sug:
        subj:
          Mathematics Evaluation
          Online Education
          Students, Undergraduate
          Student Performance Appraisal
          Anxiety
          Student Attitudes
          Confidence
          Mathematics Education
          Human
          Computer-Assisted Instruction
          Nonexperimental Studies
          United States
          Regression
          Descriptive Statistics
      ab: Background: The sudden growth in online instruction due to COVID‐19 restrictions has given renewed urgency to questions about remote learning that have remained unresolved. Web‐based assessment software provides instructors an array of options for varying testing parameters, but the pedagogical impacts of some of these variations has yet to be examined. Objectives: The current study examines whether question order affects student performance on online college math assessments. Drawing on the literature of testing and math anxiety, we hypothesized that difficult questions near the beginning of an assessment would have a destructive effect on student confidence, which would in turn have a deleterious effect on their performance. Methods: We employed an observational 'big data' methodology, analysing 23,468 final exams completed by students in 10 different courses over eight semesters at a Math Emporium in a large technical university in the eastern United States. Students were freshmen and sophomores enrolled in non‐engineering math courses. We regressed the final score on the difficulty level of the first and second questions, controlling for several other factors. Results and Conclusions: We found that several factors—day of the week, amount of time before the deadline, number of minutes spent on the exam—have more of an impact on score than question order. This pattern was consistent across sexes. Takeaways: Our findings contradict some previous studies, which have found that difficult early questions degrade student performance, and that this affect is more pronounced in females. This work enriches our understanding of how students respond to online assessment. Lay Description: What is already known about this topic: Previous studies have had mixed results about the effect of question difficulty ordering on student performance.Furthermore, few studies have examined this issue for computer assessments. What this paper adds: We employ a novel methodology with a uniquely large data set.Our findings indicate that difficulty ordering has no effect on student performance. Implications for practice: Math instructors can use the random ordering feature of computer assessment generating tools because question order does not affect performance.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        equations & formulas
        pictorial
        research
        tables/charts
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N