Functionalism, Reductionism, and Levels of Reality.

I consider a problem for functional reductionism based on the following tension. Say that b is functionally reduced to a. On one hand, a and b turn out to be identical, and identity is a symmetric relation. On the other hand, functional reductionism implies that a and b are asymmetrically related: i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Philosophy of Science Vol. 90; no. 4; pp. 922 - 937
Autor principal: Lorenzetti, Lorenzo
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Cambridge University Press Oct2023
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=173151297&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 173151297
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00318248
        PSC
      jtl: Philosophy of Science
      issn: 00318248
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Oct2023
      vid: 90
      iid: 4
      pid: 15979
      pub: Cambridge University Press
    artinfo:
      ui:
        173151297
        10.1017/psa.2023.4
      ppf: 922
      ppct: 15
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
              size: 200KB
      tig:
        atl: Functionalism, Reductionism, and Levels of Reality.
      aug:
        au: Lorenzetti, Lorenzo
        affil: Department of Philosophy, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
      su: Reductionism
      sug:
        subj: Reductionism
      ab: I consider a problem for functional reductionism based on the following tension. Say that b is functionally reduced to a. On one hand, a and b turn out to be identical, and identity is a symmetric relation. On the other hand, functional reductionism implies that a and b are asymmetrically related: if b is functionally reduced to a , then a is not functionally reduced to b. Thus we ask, how can a and b be asymmetrically related if they are the same thing? I propose a solution to this tension by distinguishing between ontological levels and levels of description.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: Copyright of Philosophy of Science is the property of Cambridge University Press and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.
      item: Philosophy of Science
      holder: Cambridge University Press
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2023
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N