From Assessment to Design: What Is Really Needed in Technology Accompaniment to Achieve Subject Constitution?
Based on the argument that technologies mediate human experience and praxis, the idea of technology accompaniment has been suggested as an approach to developing human-tech relations. In light of this idea, this paper argues, firstly, that when technologies inevitably have moral relevance in influen...
| Publicado en: | Frontiers of Philosophy in China Vol. 15; no. 1; pp. 73 - 93 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Higher Education Press Limited Company
Mar2020
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=173671116&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: hlh uiTerm: 173671116 longDbName: Humanities International Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 16733436 3CPI jtl: Frontiers of Philosophy in China issn: 16733436 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Mar2020 vid: 15 iid: 1 pid: 68417 pub: Higher Education Press Limited Company artinfo: ui: 173671116 10.3868/s030-009-020-0006-2 ppf: 73 ppct: 20 formats: fmt: @attributes: type: P size: 1.5MB tig: atl: From Assessment to Design: What Is Really Needed in Technology Accompaniment to Achieve Subject Constitution? aug: au: JIA Lumeng HUNG Ching affil: Research Center for Science, Technology and Society, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300350, China Department of Philosophy, University of Twente, Enschede, 7500AE, The Netherlands su: Mediation Technology assessment Constitutions Praxis (Process) Moral education sug: subj: Mediation Technology assessment Constitutions Praxis (Process) Moral education keyword: Knowing-doing gap meta-mediation design subject constitution technological mediation technology accompaniment ab: Based on the argument that technologies mediate human experience and praxis, the idea of technology accompaniment has been suggested as an approach to developing human-tech relations. In light of this idea, this paper argues, firstly, that when technologies inevitably have moral relevance in influencing human perceptions and actions, the constitution of a moral subject has much to do with shaping technological mediation deliberately and creatively. While there is not always a direct connection between what humans know and what humans do, technological mediation can help to strengthen people's motivation to do the right thing. Subsequently, we examine two approaches that have often been suggested for realizing subject-constitution-with-technology: one is Technology Assessment, and the other is Mediation Design. Although the former can equip people with knowledge about technological mediation, it is relatively weak when it comes to directly producing moral behavior. In contrast, the latter not only exerts a more direct impact on user behavior but may also improve people's moral knowledge. Nonetheless, both approaches face the general challenge of moral education. As moral knowledge does not guarantee moral behavior, knowing facts and theories about technological mediation may not lead to subject constitution as a result of the development of the human-tech relationship. To overcome this difficulty, an extension of the latter approach is proposed. The design of meta-mediation has great potential to shift users' attention to the aforementioned mediating effect of technology-in-use and, thereby, users' subject constitution can be enabled. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: Y custom: Copyright of Frontiers of Philosophy in China is the property of Higher Education Press Limited Company and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. item: Frontiers of Philosophy in China holder: Higher Education Press Limited Company dt: @attributes: year: 2020 holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|