Šliogerio ir Heideggerio hominizuotos būties sampratos skirtumai jų meno filosofijose.

Two different philosophical attitudes towards the hominized Being are analyzed: the one of Arvydas Šliogeris and the other of Martin Heidegger. The aim is to show the philosophy of Being in relation to particular paintings. Šliogeris interprets the picture of The Great Pine Tree by Paul Cézanne, whe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Problems / Problemos Vol. 104; pp. 132 - 146
Autor principal: Kavaliauskas, Tomas
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Vilnius University 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=174046303&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 174046303
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        13921126
        3D4C
      jtl: Problems / Problemos
      issn: 13921126
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: 2023
      vid: 104
      pid: 16037
      pub: Vilnius University
    artinfo:
      ui:
        174046303
        10.15388/Problemos.2023.104.10
      ppf: 132
      ppct: 14
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
            size: 2.9MB
      tig:
        atl: Šliogerio ir Heideggerio hominizuotos būties sampratos skirtumai jų meno filosofijose.
      aug:
        au: Kavaliauskas, Tomas
        affil: Vytauto Didžiojo universiteto Filosofijos katedra
      su:
        Art theory
        Heidegger, Martin, 1889-1976
        Painting
        Artists' books
        Author-reader relationships
        Pine
      sug:
        subj:
          Art theory
          Heidegger, Martin, 1889-1976
          Painting
          Artists' books
          Author-reader relationships
          Pine
      keyword:
        Being
        Heidegger
        hominization
        painting
        substantial individual
        Šliogeris
        Būtis
        Heideggeris
        hominizacija
        substancinis individas
        tapyba
      ab:
        Two different philosophical attitudes towards the hominized Being are analyzed: the one of Arvydas Šliogeris and the other of Martin Heidegger. The aim is to show the philosophy of Being in relation to particular paintings. Šliogeris interprets the picture of The Great Pine Tree by Paul Cézanne, whereas Heidegger - the picture of A Pair of Shoes by Vincent van Gogh. The author of the article explains how Aristotle's concept of the individual substance is related to the art philosophy of Šliogeris. The article also shows how Šliogeris' critique of the hominized Being consistently evolved starting with his book The Thing and Art and culminating with his major work, titled The Silence of Transcendence. At the end of the article the author brings to the reader's attention two self-contradictory notions of an artist that we find in different books of Šliogeris: the first notion that speaks of a Human-artist who supposedly imbues 'more Being' into a painting than we find it in nature; whereas the second notion speaks of a Nature-artist and provides to things 'more Being' than we find it in art.
        Straipsnis skirtas palyginti Arvydo Šliogerio ir Martino Heideggerio hominizuotos Būties sampratoms jų meno filosofijose. Šio tikslo siekiama pasitelkiant jų pasirinktų tapybos kūrinių interpretacijas - Šliogerio atveju pasirinktas Paulio Cézanne'o paveikslas Didžioji pušis, o Heideggerio atveju pasirinktas Vincento van Gogho paveikslas Batų pora. Straipsnio autorius pateikia argumentus, kaip pasirinktas Šliogerio meno kūrinys koreliuoja su jo aristoteliška substancinio individo koncepcija. Sykiu parodoma, kaip nuosekliai evoliucionavo Šliogerio hominizuotos Būties kritika nuo knygos Daiktas ir menas iki veikalo Transcendencijos tyla. Straipsnio pabaigoje išryškintas Šliogerio prieštaravimas sau dėl dviejų nesuderinamų menininko sampratų: pirmas apie Menininką-žmogų, įliejantį „daugiau Būties" į daiktą meno kūrinyje, negu kad tos Būties yra tame daikte gamtoje; antras apie tikrąjį Menininką-gamtą, kuris duoda daiktui „daugiau Būties", negu jos randame žmogaus rankdarbyje.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: Lithuanian
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: Copyright of Problems / Problemos is the property of Vilnius University and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.
      item: Problems / Problemos
      holder: Vilnius University
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2023
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N