Cannabidiol does not attenuate acute delta‐9‐tetrahydrocannabinol‐induced attentional bias in healthy volunteers: A randomised, double‐blind, cross‐over study.

Aims: To test how attentional bias and explicit liking are influenced by delta‐9‐tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) and whether these effects are moderated by cannabidiol (CBD). Design: Double‐blind, randomised, within‐subjects cross‐over study. Setting NIHR Wellcome Trust Clinical Research Facility at King...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Addiction Vol. 119; no. 2; pp. 322 - 334
Autores principales: Oliver, Dominic, Englund, Amir, Chesney, Edward, Chester, Lucy, Wilson, Jack, Sovi, Simina, Wigroth, Stina, Hodsoll, John, Strang, John, Murray, Robin M., Freeman, Tom P., Fusar‐Poli, Paolo, McGuire, Philip
Formato: pictorial research tables/charts randomized controlled trial Journal Article
Publicado: Wiley-Blackwell Feb2024
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=174713395&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 174713395
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        09652140
        AIO
      jtl: Addiction
      issn: 09652140
      maglogo: Y
    pubinfo:
      dt: Feb2024
      vid: 119
      iid: 2
      pid: 480
      pub: Wiley-Blackwell
      place: Malden, Massachusetts
    artinfo:
      ui:
        174713395
        172905342
        174713395
        174713395
        10.1111/add.16353
        174713395
      ppf: 322
      ppct: 12
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: C
          – @attributes:
              type: P
      tig:
        atl: Cannabidiol does not attenuate acute delta‐9‐tetrahydrocannabinol‐induced attentional bias in healthy volunteers: A randomised, double‐blind, cross‐over study.
      aug:
        au:
          Oliver, Dominic
          Englund, Amir
          Chesney, Edward
          Chester, Lucy
          Wilson, Jack
          Sovi, Simina
          Wigroth, Stina
          Hodsoll, John
          Strang, John
          Murray, Robin M.
          Freeman, Tom P.
          Fusar‐Poli, Paolo
          McGuire, Philip
        affil: Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
      sug:
        subj:
          Substance Use Disorders Chemically Induced
          Attentional Bias Evaluation
          Cannabis Adverse Effects
          Hydrocarbons Adverse Effects
          Cannabidiol Therapeutic Use
          Cannabidiol Pharmacodynamics
          Human
          Randomized Controlled Trials
          Double-Blind Studies
          Descriptive Statistics
          Data Analysis Software
          Male
          Female
          Young Adult
          Adult
          Cannabis Administration and Dosage
          Middle Age
          Odds Ratio
          Confidence Intervals
          Funding Source
          Adult: 19-44 years
          Middle Aged: 45-64 years
          Male
          Female
      ab: Aims: To test how attentional bias and explicit liking are influenced by delta‐9‐tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) and whether these effects are moderated by cannabidiol (CBD). Design: Double‐blind, randomised, within‐subjects cross‐over study. Setting NIHR Wellcome Trust Clinical Research Facility at King's College Hospital, London, United Kingdom. Participants/Cases: Forty‐six infrequent cannabis users (cannabis use <1 per week). Intervention(s): Across four sessions, participants inhaled vaporised cannabis containing 10 mg of THC and either 0 mg (0:1 CBD:THC), 10 mg (1:1), 20 mg (2:1) or 30 mg (3:1) of CBD, administered in a randomised order and counter‐balanced across participants (a total of 24 order groups). Measurements Participants completed two tasks: (1) Attentional Bias (AB), comparing reaction times toward visual probes presented behind 28 target stimuli (cannabis/food) compared with probes behind corresponding non‐target (neutral) stimuli. Participants responding more quickly to probes behind target than non‐target stimuli would indicate greater attentional bias to cannabis/food; (2) Picture Rating (PR), where all AB stimuli were rated on a 7‐point pleasantness scale, measuring explicit liking. Findings During the AB task, participants were more biased toward cannabis stimuli in the 0:1 condition compared with baseline (mean difference = 12.2, 95% confidence intervals [CIs] = 1.20–23.3, d = 0.41, P = 0.03). No other significant AB or PR differences were found between cannabis and food stimuli between baseline and 0:1 condition (P > 0.05). No significant CBD effect was found on AB or PR task performance at any dose (P > 0.05). There was additionally no cumulative effect of THC exposure on AB or PR outcomes (P > 0.05). Conclusions: A double‐blind, randomised, cross‐over study among infrequent cannabis users found that inhaled delta‐9‐tetrahydrocannabinol increased attentional bias toward cannabis in the absence of explicit liking, a marker of liability toward cannabis use disorder. At the concentrations normally found in legal and illegal cannabis, cannabidiol had no influence on this effect.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        pictorial
        research
        tables/charts
        randomized controlled trial
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N