A Collaborative Approach to Mentored Peer Reviews Sponsored by the Council of Residency Directors in Emergency Medicine.

Introduction: Historically, there have been no systematic programs for teaching peer review, leaving trainees to learn by trial and error. Recently, a number of publications have advocated for programs where experienced reviewers mentor trainees to more efficiently acquire this knowledge. Objective:...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Western Journal of Emergency Medicine: Integrating Emergency Care with Population Health Vol. 25; no. 1; pp. 111 - 117
Autores principales: Love, Jeffrey N., Merritt, Chris, Ilgen, Jonathan S., Messman, Anne M., Way, David P., Ander, Douglas S., Coates, Wendy C.
Formato: tables/charts Journal Article
Publicado: Western Journal of Emergency Medicine: Integrating Emergency Care with Population Health Jan2024
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=174756963&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 174756963
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        1936900X
        8B61
      jtl: Western Journal of Emergency Medicine: Integrating Emergency Care with Population Health
      issn: 1936900X
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Jan2024
      vid: 25
      iid: 1
      pid: 29816
      pub: Western Journal of Emergency Medicine: Integrating Emergency Care with Population Health
      place: Orange, California
    artinfo:
      ui:
        174756963
        174756963
        174756963
        10.5811/westjem.61488
        174756963
      ppf: 111
      ppct: 6
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
      tig:
        atl: A Collaborative Approach to Mentored Peer Reviews Sponsored by the Council of Residency Directors in Emergency Medicine.
      aug:
        au:
          Love, Jeffrey N.
          Merritt, Chris
          Ilgen, Jonathan S.
          Messman, Anne M.
          Way, David P.
          Ander, Douglas S.
          Coates, Wendy C.
        affil: Georgetown University School of Medicine, Department of Emergency Medicine, Washington, DC
      sug:
        subj:
          Emergency Medicine Education
          Internship and Residency
          Peer Review
          Mentorship
          Education, Medical
          Collaboration
          Curriculum Development
          Educational Status
          Training Support, Financial
          Concept Formation
          Knowledge Evaluation
          Teaching Methods
          Learning Methods
      ab: Introduction: Historically, there have been no systematic programs for teaching peer review, leaving trainees to learn by trial and error. Recently, a number of publications have advocated for programs where experienced reviewers mentor trainees to more efficiently acquire this knowledge. Objective: Our goal was to develop an introductory learning experience that intentionally fosters peer-review skills. Methods: The Council of Residency Directors in Emergency Medicine (CORD) offered education fellowship directors the opportunity to mentor their fellows by reviewing submitted manuscript(s) supplemented by educational material provided by their journal. Reviews were collaboratively created. The decision letter that was sent to manuscript authors was also sent to the mentees; it included all reviewers' and editor's comments, as feedback. In 2022, fellows received a post-experience survey regarding prior experiences and their perspectives of the mentored peer-review experience. Results: From 2020-2022, participation grew from 14 to 30 education fellowships, providing 76 manuscript peer reviews. The 2022 survey-response rate of 87% (20/23) revealed that fellows were inexperienced in education scholarship prior to participation: 30% had authored an education paper, and 10% had performed peer review of an education manuscript. Overall, participants were enthusiastic about the program and anxious to participate the following year. In addition, participants identified a number of benefits of the mentored experience including improved understanding of the scholarship process; informing fellows' scholarly pursuits; improved conceptualization of concepts learned elsewhere in training; and learning through exposure to scholarship. Conclusion: This program's early findings suggest that collaboration between academic societies and interested graduate medical education faculty has the potential to formalize the process of learning peer review, benefitting all involved stakeholders.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        tables/charts
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N