How a pure risk of harm can itself be a harm: A reply to Rowe.

Rowe has recently argued that pure risk of harm cannot itself be a harm. I respond to Rowe and argue that given an appropriate understanding of objective probabilities, pure objective risk of harm can itself be a harm.

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Analysis Vol. 84; no. 1; pp. 112 - 117
Autor principal: Stefánsson, H Orri
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Oxford University Press / USA Jan2024
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=175416597&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 175416597
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00032638
        7OX
      jtl: Analysis
      issn: 00032638
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Jan2024
      vid: 84
      iid: 1
      pid: 622
      pub: Oxford University Press / USA
    artinfo:
      ui:
        175416597
        10.1093/analys/anad055
      ppf: 112
      ppct: 5
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
              size: 91KB
      tig:
        atl: How a pure risk of harm can itself be a harm: A reply to Rowe.
      aug:
        au: Stefánsson, H Orri
        affil: Stockholm University Swedish Collegium for Advanced Study Institute for Futures Studies , Sweden
      su:
        Iterative methods (Mathematics)
        Numerical analysis
        Iterative decoding
        Conjugate gradient methods
        Generalized minimal residual method
      sug:
        subj:
          Iterative methods (Mathematics)
          Numerical analysis
          Iterative decoding
          Conjugate gradient methods
          Generalized minimal residual method
      keyword:
        chance
        harm
        risk
      ab: Rowe has recently argued that pure risk of harm cannot itself be a harm. I respond to Rowe and argue that given an appropriate understanding of objective probabilities, pure objective risk of harm can itself be a harm.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: © 2019 The Analysis Trust.
      item: Analysis
      holder: Oxford University Press / USA
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2024
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N