How a pure risk of harm can itself be a harm: A reply to Rowe.

Rowe has recently argued that pure risk of harm cannot itself be a harm. I respond to Rowe and argue that given an appropriate understanding of objective probabilities, pure objective risk of harm can itself be a harm.

Bibliographic Details
Published in:	Analysis Vol. 84; no. 1; pp. 112 - 117
Main Author:	Stefánsson, H Orri
Format:	Article
Published:	Oxford University Press / USA Jan2024
Subjects:	Iterative methods (Mathematics) Numerical analysis Iterative decoding Conjugate gradient methods Generalized minimal residual method
Online Access:	View this record in EBSCOhost

Description
Summary:	Rowe has recently argued that pure risk of harm cannot itself be a harm. I respond to Rowe and argue that given an appropriate understanding of objective probabilities, pure objective risk of harm can itself be a harm.