What Do We Teach to Engineering Students: Embedded Ethics, Morality, and Politics.

In the past few years, calls for integrating ethics modules in engineering curricula have multiplied. Despite this positive trend, a number of issues with these ‘embedded’ programs remains. First, learning goals are underspecified. A second limitation is the conflation of different dimensions under...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Science & Engineering Ethics Vol. 30; no. 1; pp. 1 - 27
Autores principales: Ferdman, Avigail, Ratti, Emanuele
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Springer Nature Feb2024
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=175533394&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 175533394
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        13533452
        GNI
      jtl: Science & Engineering Ethics
      issn: 13533452
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Feb2024
      vid: 30
      iid: 1
      pid: 237
      pub: Springer Nature
    artinfo:
      ui:
        175533394
        10.1007/s11948-024-00469-1
      ppf: 1
      ppct: 26
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
              size: 1014KB
      tig:
        atl: What Do We Teach to Engineering Students: Embedded Ethics, Morality, and Politics.
      aug:
        au:
          Ferdman, Avigail
          Ratti, Emanuele
        affil:
          https://ror.org/03qryx823 Department of Humanities and Arts, Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel
          https://ror.org/0524sp257 Department of Philosophy, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
      sug:
      keyword:
        Embedded ethics
        Morality
        Politics
        Teaching ethics
        Virtues
      ab: In the past few years, calls for integrating ethics modules in engineering curricula have multiplied. Despite this positive trend, a number of issues with these ‘embedded’ programs remains. First, learning goals are underspecified. A second limitation is the conflation of different dimensions under the same banner, in particular confusion between ethics curricula geared towards addressing the ethics of individual conduct and curricula geared towards addressing ethics at the societal level. In this article, we propose a tripartite framework to overcome these difficulties. Our framework analytically decomposes an ethics module into three dimensions. First, there is the ethical dimension, which pertains to the learning goals. Second, there is the moral dimension, which addresses the moral relevance of engineers’ conduct. Finally, there is the political dimension, which scales up issues of moral relevance at the civic level. All in all, our framework has two advantages. First, it provides analytic clarity, i.e. it enables course instructors to locate ethical dilemmas in either the moral or political realm and to make use of the tools and resources from moral and/or political philosophy. Second, it depicts a comprehensive ethical training, which enables students to both reason about moral issues in the abstract, and to socially contextualize potential solutions.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: Science & Engineering Ethics is a copyright of Springer, 2024. All Rights Reserved.
      item: Science & Engineering Ethics
      holder: Springer Nature
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2024
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N