Comparison of Task-Layered Clinical Orientation to Traditional Orientation in a RN Residency Program.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare outcomes of using a task-layered clinical orientation when compared with the original patient-layering approach. BACKGROUND: Use of task-layering to orient new graduate nurses to the clinical world of nursing has been theorized to provide a decreas...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Journal of Nursing Administration (JONA) Vol. 54; no. 6; pp. 341 - 347
Autores principales: Cantrell, Faith, Shah, Jinal, Hessler, Karen, Dunn, Kelli, Skroch, Alisa, Hochheimer, Camille
Formato: research tables/charts Journal Article
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Jun2024
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare outcomes of using a task-layered clinical orientation when compared with the original patient-layering approach. BACKGROUND: Use of task-layering to orient new graduate nurses to the clinical world of nursing has been theorized to provide a decrease in cognitive load and allow for more streamlined clinical orientation. METHODS: The method of this study was a nonrandomized, comparative design to measure the outcomes of length of orientation, new graduate perceptions about level of confidence/comfort with professional nurse responsibilities/skills, stress, satisfaction, and perceptions about orientation. RESULTS: Analysis revealed no statistical significance between the 2 groups. However, the task-layered clinical orientation group completed orientation earlier than the traditional patient-layered group. CONCLUSIONS: The task-layered approach to clinical orientation provided as good of outcomes as traditional orientation strategy and may result in cost savings due to decrease in total clinical orientation days.