Quality Matters Review of LIB 2210: Applying the QM Rubric for Higher Education to an Information Literacy Course.
This article discusses the use of the Quality Matters Rubric for Higher Education, 6th ed. to self-review an asynchronous information literacy course. In this instance, the authors acted as reviewers and subject matter experts (SME). The Rubric proved to be a useful tool that encompasses several ins...
| Publicado en: | Journal of Library & Information Services in Distance Learning Vol. 18; no. 1/2; pp. 1 - 18 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , , |
| Formato: | pictorial Journal Article |
| Publicado: |
Taylor & Francis Ltd
Jan-Jun2024
|
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=177519988&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ccm uiTerm: 177519988 longDbName: CINAHL Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: dissinfo: jinfo: jid: 1533290X 88O jtl: Journal of Library & Information Services in Distance Learning issn: 1533290X maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Jan-Jun2024 vid: 18 iid: 1/2 pid: 377 pub: Taylor & Francis Ltd place: Philadelphia, Pennsylvania artinfo: ui: 177519988 173146537 177519988 177519988 10.1080/1533290X.2023.2272872 177519988 ppf: 1 ppct: 17 formats: tig: atl: Quality Matters Review of LIB 2210: Applying the QM Rubric for Higher Education to an Information Literacy Course. aug: au: Sheets, Laura A. Barry, Maureen Bosch, Eileen K. affil: Library Instruction Coordinator, Bowling Green State University, Bowling Green, OH, USA sug: subj: Libraries, Academic Quality Assessment Online Education Teaching Methods Information Literacy Education Librarians Education, Non-Traditional Quality Assurance Learning Methods Seminars and Workshops Textbooks Course Evaluation Learning Environment United States ab: This article discusses the use of the Quality Matters Rubric for Higher Education, 6th ed. to self-review an asynchronous information literacy course. In this instance, the authors acted as reviewers and subject matter experts (SME). The Rubric proved to be a useful tool that encompasses several instructional design best practices. After the official self-review period, the QM Rubric influenced the enhancement and updates to the course. The authors recommend more use of the QM Rubric by teaching librarians, collaboration with instructors going through a QM Review, and training for online teaching in Library and Information Science graduate programs. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: pictorial Journal Article ougenre: Article language: English refInfo: holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|