Words Matter: Reframing Communication Sciences and Disorders Programs' Thinking About Adolescents.

Purpose: The purpose of this investigation was to evaluate language development and disorders course titles across communication sciences and disorders (CSD) graduate programs in an effort to determine whether adolescents were specifically being recognized via inclusive language or dedicated courses...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Perspectives of the ASHA Special Interest Groups Vol. 9; no. 3; pp. 613 - 627
Autores principales: Nellenbach, Kristin, Knight, Carrie, Jennings, Bailey
Formato: research tables/charts Journal Article
Publicado: American Speech-Language-Hearing Association Jun2024
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=177681605&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 177681605
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        2381473X
        KTSD
      jtl: Perspectives of the ASHA Special Interest Groups
      issn: 2381473X
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Jun2024
      vid: 9
      iid: 3
      pid: 42
      pub: American Speech-Language-Hearing Association
      place: Rockville, Maryland
    artinfo:
      ui:
        177681605
        177681605
        177681605
        10.1044/2024_PERSP-23-00051
        177681605
      ppf: 613
      ppct: 14
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
      tig:
        atl: Words Matter: Reframing Communication Sciences and Disorders Programs' Thinking About Adolescents.
      aug:
        au:
          Nellenbach, Kristin
          Knight, Carrie
          Jennings, Bailey
        affil: Department of Communication Disorders, Louisiana Tech University, Ruston
      sug:
        subj:
          Language Disorders In Adolescence
          Language Development
          Communication
          Program Evaluation
          Critical Thinking
          Curriculum
          Human
          Male
          Female
          Adolescence
          Education, Speech-Language Pathology
          Students, Speech-Language Pathology
          Post Hoc Analysis
          Speech-Language Pathologist Attitudes
          Thematic Analysis
          Statistical Significance
          Data Analysis Software
          Descriptive Statistics
          Adolescent: 13-18 years
          Male
          Female
      ab: Purpose: The purpose of this investigation was to evaluate language development and disorders course titles across communication sciences and disorders (CSD) graduate programs in an effort to determine whether adolescents were specifically being recognized via inclusive language or dedicated courses. The findings can be used to propel important discussions about the need for inclusive course titles, inform initial directions for improvements in preprofessional education, and guide broader changes in the discipline, especially for the adolescent population. Method: A review of accredited CSD graduate programs across the United States was conducted using the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association EdFind database. A total of 298 master's-level CSD programs were used for this study. CSD course titles located in each of the university's graduate catalogs were documented, categorized, and reviewed by the research team. Results: Of the 298 CSD graduate programs reviewed, one in eight specifically included the word "adolescent(s)" or "adolescence" in the titles of their language development and disorders courses. Remarkably, only four adolescentfocused courses, two of which were listed as electives, were offered across all reviewed programs. A post hoc analysis of the language used in course titling revealed that 42 titles used inclusive terminology. Conclusions: Adolescents are developmentally distinct from children, yet a majority of CSD graduate programs used ambiguous or exclusive words in the titles of their language development and disorders courses. The unintentional failure to recognize this important difference in course titles may be contributing to the ongoing neglect of adolescents within the field. Reframing collective thinking is required for change. Reasons and suggestions for including adolescents in course titles and separate offerings are provided to assist CSD graduate programs in leading the way toward improving equity for adolescents.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        research
        tables/charts
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N