Self‐efficacy, prosocial impact, and self‐legitimacy as psychological predictors of judicial officer performance.
The current work explores three potential facilitators of judicial performance. Participants in a state‐wide survey of judicial officers (response rate = 33.9 percent) completed self‐report measures of self‐efficacy, prosocial impact, and self‐legitimacy as well as subjectively perceived performance...
| Publicado en: | Public Administration Review Vol. 84; no. 4; pp. 710 - 726 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , , , |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Wiley-Blackwell
Jul2024
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=178049234&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ssf uiTerm: 178049234 longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson) uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 00333352 PBA jtl: Public Administration Review issn: 00333352 maglogo: Y pubinfo: dt: Jul2024 vid: 84 iid: 4 pid: 480 pub: Wiley-Blackwell artinfo: ui: 178049234 10.1111/puar.13723 ppf: 710 ppct: 16 formats: fmt: – @attributes: type: T – @attributes: type: P size: 559KB tig: atl: Self‐efficacy, prosocial impact, and self‐legitimacy as psychological predictors of judicial officer performance. aug: au: Hamm, Joseph A. Ropp, John W. Witwer, Amanda Scott, Brent A. affil: School of Criminal Justice, Michigan State University, East Lansing Michigan,, USA Department of Political Science, Michigan State University, East Lansing Michigan,, USA Eli Broad College of Business, Michigan State University, East Lansing Michigan,, USA su: Court personnel Self-efficacy Administrative courts Latent variables Stimulus & response (Psychology) sug: subj: Court personnel Self-efficacy Administrative courts Provincial courts of law Municipal courts of law Courts Latent variables Stimulus & response (Psychology) ab: The current work explores three potential facilitators of judicial performance. Participants in a state‐wide survey of judicial officers (response rate = 33.9 percent) completed self‐report measures of self‐efficacy, prosocial impact, and self‐legitimacy as well as subjectively perceived performance. Objective performance data collected by the state court administrative office were then merged with the survey data. Latent variable analysis confirmed the three predictor constructs' separability, and although all four concepts were correlated, self‐efficacy was the sole independent predictor of subjective performance. An unplanned mediation analysis suggested significant indirect effects of self‐legitimacy and prosocial impact on subjectively assessed performance through self‐efficacy. Regarding objective performance, self‐efficacy emerged as the only significant correlate or predictor. The research therefore empirically demonstrates the empirical distinctiveness of self‐efficacy, prosocial impact, and self‐legitimacy and provides some exploratory support for a causal model whereby self‐efficacy provides the proximal impact on performance but is itself facilitated by prosocial impact and self‐legitimacy. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: N holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|