Differences in the Development of Mathematics Motivation within and across Socioeconomic Status: Do Early Adolescents' Failure Beliefs Matter?

Interest in socioeconomic differences in academic motivation has been longstanding. However, previous research has often treated both low- and high-SES students as homogenous groups. This study aims to address this gap by investigating the developmental trajectory profiles of mathematics motivation...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Journal of Youth & Adolescence Vol. 53; no. 9; pp. 2032 - 2045
Autores principales: Zhao, Baoxu, Qi, Cai, Wu, Yifang, Guo, Xiaolin, Liu, Chunhui, Luo, Liang
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Springer Nature Sep2024
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=179087341&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ssf
    uiTerm: 179087341
    longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson)
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00472891
        JYA
      jtl: Journal of Youth & Adolescence
      issn: 00472891
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Sep2024
      vid: 53
      iid: 9
      pid: 237
      pub: Springer Nature
    artinfo:
      ui:
        179087341
        10.1007/s10964-024-02002-w
      ppf: 2032
      ppct: 13
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
              size: 1MB
      tig:
        atl: Differences in the Development of Mathematics Motivation within and across Socioeconomic Status: Do Early Adolescents' Failure Beliefs Matter?
      aug:
        au:
          Zhao, Baoxu
          Qi, Cai
          Wu, Yifang
          Guo, Xiaolin
          Liu, Chunhui
          Luo, Liang
        affil:
          https://ror.org/022k4wk35 Collaborative Innovation Center of Assessment for Basic Education Quality, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China
          https://ror.org/022k4wk35 Institute of Developmental Psychology, Faculty of Psychology, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China
      su:
        China
        Autonomy (Psychology)
        Socioeconomic factors
        Motivation (Psychology)
        Academic achievement
        Student attitudes
        Social classes
        Mathematics
        Research funding
        Probability theory
        Chi-squared test
        Descriptive statistics
        School failure
        Longitudinal method
      sug:
        subj:
          Autonomy (Psychology)
          Socioeconomic factors
          Motivation (Psychology)
          Academic achievement
          Student attitudes
          Social classes
          China
          Mathematics
          Research funding
          Probability theory
          Chi-squared test
          Descriptive statistics
          School failure
          Longitudinal method
      keyword:
        Failure beliefs
        Mathematics motivation
        Socioeconomic status
        Failure beliefs
        Mathematics motivation
        Socioeconomic status
      ab: Interest in socioeconomic differences in academic motivation has been longstanding. However, previous research has often treated both low- and high-SES students as homogenous groups. This study aims to address this gap by investigating the developmental trajectory profiles of mathematics motivation during early adolescence, with a focus on variations within and across SES groups. Multigroup latent class growth analysis was used on a sample of 3718 early adolescents in China (initial M was 9.40 ± 0.52 years; 48.0% girls) across 2 years from grades 4 through 6. The analysis identified three distinct self-determined mathematics motivation trajectory profiles within each SES group: a good-quality profile (i.e., initially high autonomous but low controlled), a high-quantity profile (i.e., initially high both autonomous and controlled), and a low-quantity profile (i.e., initially low both autonomous and controlled). A greater proportion of low-SES students were observed within the low-quantity profile than within the good-quality profile. The study found that the failure-is-enhancing view was a protective factor against two relatively maladaptive motivational trajectory profiles (i.e., high-quantity profile and low-quantity profile), irrespective of socioeconomic background. These findings emphasize the importance of implementing motivational interventions for early adolescents that consider both structural factors (e.g., socioeconomic backgrounds) and psychological factors (e.g., failure beliefs), to foster students' academic development.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: N
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N