States of affairs and our connection with the good.

Abstractionists claim that the only bearers of intrinsic value are abstract, necessarily existing states of affairs. I argue that abstractionism cannot succeed. Though we can model concrete goods such as lives, projects, and outcomes with abstract states, conflating models of goods with the goods th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Philosophy & Phenomenological Research Vol. 109; no. 2; pp. 694 - 715
Autor principal: Tucker, Miles
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Wiley-Blackwell Sep2024
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=179963425&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 179963425
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00318205
        PPO
      jtl: Philosophy & Phenomenological Research
      issn: 00318205
      maglogo: Y
    pubinfo:
      dt: Sep2024
      vid: 109
      iid: 2
      pid: 480
      pub: Wiley-Blackwell
    artinfo:
      ui:
        179963425
        10.1111/phpr.13068
      ppf: 694
      ppct: 21
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
              size: 467KB
      tig:
        atl: States of affairs and our connection with the good.
      aug:
        au: Tucker, Miles
        affil: Department of Philosophy, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, USA
      su:
        Abstract thought
        Values (Ethics)
        Facts (Philosophy)
        Experience
        Thought & thinking
      sug:
        subj:
          Abstract thought
          Values (Ethics)
          Facts (Philosophy)
          Experience
          Thought & thinking
      keyword:
        axiology
        facts
        intrinsic value
        states of affairs
        truthmaking
      ab: Abstractionists claim that the only bearers of intrinsic value are abstract, necessarily existing states of affairs. I argue that abstractionism cannot succeed. Though we can model concrete goods such as lives, projects, and outcomes with abstract states, conflating models of goods with the goods themselves has surprising and unattractive consequences. I suggest that concrete states of affairs or facts are the only bearers of intrinsic value. I show how this proposal can overcome the concerns lodged against abstractionism and, in the process, reconnect us with the good.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: Copyright of Philosophy & Phenomenological Research is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.
      item: Philosophy & Phenomenological Research
      holder: Wiley-Blackwell
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2024
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N