Turning the tables on Hume.
Certain prior credence distributions concerning the future lead to inductivism, and others lead to inductive skepticism. I argue that it is difficult to consider the latter to be reasonable. I do not prove that they are not, but at the end of the paper, the tables are turned: in line with pre-philos...
| Published in: | Philosophical Studies Vol. 181; no. 10; pp. 2797 - 2817 |
|---|---|
| Main Author: | |
| Format: | Article |
| Published: |
Springer Nature
Oct2024
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | View this record in EBSCOhost |