An Intersectional Analysis of Women's Experiences of Inclusion in the United States Army.

In 2016, the United States Army removed its ban on women working in combat roles in previously reserved jobs for men. This policy change included a concerted effort by Army leadership to ensure women felt included in their new roles. Nevertheless, the immediate response to the policy changes led to...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Sex Roles Vol. 90; no. 11; pp. 1666 - 1681
Autores principales: Clomax, Adriane J., Mor Barak, Michàlle, Hancock, Ange-Marie, Dodge, Jessica, Kintzle, Sara, Cox, Robynn, Alday, Eva, Castro, Carl
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Springer Nature Nov2024
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
Descripción
Sumario:In 2016, the United States Army removed its ban on women working in combat roles in previously reserved jobs for men. This policy change included a concerted effort by Army leadership to ensure women felt included in their new roles. Nevertheless, the immediate response to the policy changes led to mixed results in translating and implementing these new policies. This study takes qualitative data from a study on diversity and inclusion policy and practices to investigate women's experiences working in various roles in 2019. We collected qualitative data from 19 focus groups and 120 soldiers in 2019 from four Army installations across the United States. An inductive analysis of focus group interviews revealed three major themes: social exclusion due to gender, updated policies to include women, sexism, and gender harassment. Since inclusion is an interpersonal experience, the themes were analyzed through an intersectional template to see if race and rank also played a role in women's experiences in combat roles. These findings provide a more nuanced and lived experience perspective on being a woman serving in combat in the United States Army.