Educational policy as predictor of computational thinking: A supervised machine learning approach.

Background: Computational thinking is derived from arguments that the underlying practices in computer science augment problem‐solving. Most studies investigated computational thinking development as a function of learners' factors, instructional strategies and learning environment. However, the inf...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Journal of Computer Assisted Learning Vol. 40; no. 6; pp. 2872 - 2886
Autores principales: Ezeamuzie, Ndudi O., Leung, Jessica S. C., Fung, Dennis C. L., Ezeamuzie, Mercy N.
Formato: algorithm pictorial research tables/charts Journal Article
Publicado: Wiley-Blackwell Dec2024
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=180899673&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 180899673
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        02664909
        6M1
      jtl: Journal of Computer Assisted Learning
      issn: 02664909
      maglogo: Y
    pubinfo:
      dt: Dec2024
      vid: 40
      iid: 6
      pid: 480
      pub: Wiley-Blackwell
      place: Malden, Massachusetts
    artinfo:
      ui:
        180899673
        178520760
        180899673
        180899673
        10.1111/jcal.13041
        180899673
      ppf: 2872
      ppct: 14
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: Educational policy as predictor of computational thinking: A supervised machine learning approach.
      aug:
        au:
          Ezeamuzie, Ndudi O.
          Leung, Jessica S. C.
          Fung, Dennis C. L.
          Ezeamuzie, Mercy N.
        affil: Faculty of Education, University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong
      sug:
        subj:
          Bioinformatics
          Machine Learning
          School Policies
          Technology
          Policy Making
          Autonomy
          Human
          Schools, Middle
          Students, Middle School
          Models, Educational
          Professional Autonomy
          Data Mining
          Conceptual Framework
          Rasch Analysis
          Pearson's Correlation Coefficient
          Chi Square Test
      ab: Background: Computational thinking is derived from arguments that the underlying practices in computer science augment problem‐solving. Most studies investigated computational thinking development as a function of learners' factors, instructional strategies and learning environment. However, the influence of the wider community such as educational policies on computational thinking remains unclear. Objectives: This study examines the impact of basic and technology‐related educational policies on the development of computational thinking. Methods: Using supervised machine learning, the computational thinking achievements of 31,823 eighth graders across nine countries were analysed. Seven rule‐based and tree‐based classification models were generated and triangulated to determine how educational policies predicted students' computational thinking. Results and conclusions: Predictions show that students have a higher propensity to develop computational thinking skills when schools exercise full autonomy in governance and explicitly embed computational thinking in their curriculum. Plans to support students, teachers and schools with technology or introduce 1:1 computing have no discernible predicted influence on students' computational thinking achievement. Implications: Although predictions deduced from these attributes are not generalizable, traces of how educational policies affect computational thinking exist to articulate more fronts for future research on the influence of educational policies on computational thinking. Lay description: What is already known about this topicComputational thinking (CT) is a problem‐solving skill.Inquiries on CT focus on learners' factors such as age, gender and attitudes.Also, the choice of instructional strategies and learning environment influence CT development. What this paper addsArticulated how the wider community structures influence the development of CT.Educational policies affect the development of computational thinking. Implications for practicesStudents have a higher predicted propensity to develop CT when schools exercise full autonomy in governance and embed CT in the curriculum explicitly.Plans to support students, teachers and schools with technology or plans to introduce 1:1 computing have no discernible influence on students' CT.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        algorithm
        pictorial
        research
        tables/charts
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N