Experience and naturalism.
Much of contemporary metaethics revolves around the issue of "naturalism." However, there is little agreement on what "naturalism" is or why it should be of significance. In this paper, I aim to rectify this situation by providing a set of necessary conditions on what positions ought to count as "na...
| Publicado en: | European Journal of Philosophy Vol. 32; no. 4; pp. 1334 - 1353 |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Wiley-Blackwell
Dec2024
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=181570541&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: hlh uiTerm: 181570541 longDbName: Humanities International Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 09668373 7PU jtl: European Journal of Philosophy issn: 09668373 maglogo: Y pubinfo: dt: Dec2024 vid: 32 iid: 4 pid: 480 pub: Wiley-Blackwell artinfo: ui: 181570541 10.1111/ejop.12974 ppf: 1334 ppct: 19 formats: fmt: – @attributes: type: T – @attributes: type: P size: 1.6MB tig: atl: Experience and naturalism. aug: au: Zweber, Adam affil: UNC Wilmington ‐ Philosophy and Religion, Wilmington North Carolina, , USA su: Naturalism Metaethics Ethics Philosophy Phenomenology sug: subj: Naturalism Metaethics Ethics Philosophy Phenomenology ab: Much of contemporary metaethics revolves around the issue of "naturalism." However, there is little agreement on what "naturalism" is or why it should be of significance. In this paper, I aim to rectify this situation by providing a set of necessary conditions on what positions ought to count as "naturalistic." A metaethical view should count as an instance of naturalism only if it claims that there can be evidence for normative claims that is both public and spatiotemporal. I argue that, unlike other characterizations of "naturalism," this view shows a clear difference between many metaethical positions and the sciences. The view thereby renders debates about naturalism philosophically significant: the division between naturalists and non‐naturalists is that between philosophers who hold that ethics is relevantly similar to the sciences and those who deny this. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: Y custom: Copyright of European Journal of Philosophy is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. item: European Journal of Philosophy holder: Wiley-Blackwell dt: @attributes: year: 2024 holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|