Infinite inference and mathematical conventionalism.
We argue that (1) a purported example of an infinite inference we humans can actually perform admits a faithful, finitary description, and (2) infinite inference contravenes any view which does not grant our minds uncomputable powers. These arguments block the strategy, dating back to Carnap's Logic...
| Published in: | Philosophy & Phenomenological Research Vol. 109; no. 3; pp. 897 - 913 |
|---|---|
| Main Author: | |
| Format: | Article |
| Published: |
Wiley-Blackwell
Nov2024
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | View this record in EBSCOhost |