Review: Animal‐assisted intervention for children with attention‐deficit/hyperactivity disorder – a systematic review and meta‐analysis.

Background: Animal‐assisted interventions (AAIs) have emerged as a promising nonpharmacological intervention option for children diagnosed with attention‐deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). However, recent systematic reviews have been primarily narrative. Additionally, the pooled effectiveness of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Child & Adolescent Mental Health Vol. 30; no. 1; pp. 34 - 53
Autores principales: Yu, Shuxin, Xue, Hui, Xie, Yuqing, Shao, Guanyue, Hao, Yihui, Fan, Lijun, Du, Wei
Formato: meta analysis research systematic review tables/charts Journal Article
Publicado: Wiley-Blackwell Feb2025
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=183926487&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 183926487
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        1475357X
        K90
      jtl: Child & Adolescent Mental Health
      issn: 1475357X
      maglogo: Y
    pubinfo:
      dt: Feb2025
      vid: 30
      iid: 1
      pid: 480
      pub: Wiley-Blackwell
      place: Malden, Massachusetts
    artinfo:
      ui:
        183926487
        183926487
        183926487
        10.1111/camh.12744
        183926487
      ppf: 34
      ppct: 19
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: Review: Animal‐assisted intervention for children with attention‐deficit/hyperactivity disorder – a systematic review and meta‐analysis.
      aug:
        au:
          Yu, Shuxin
          Xue, Hui
          Xie, Yuqing
          Shao, Guanyue
          Hao, Yihui
          Fan, Lijun
          Du, Wei
        affil: School of Public Health, Southeast University, Nanjing, China
      sug:
        subj:
          Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder Therapy
          Pet Therapy Methods
          Treatment Outcomes
          Human
          Funding Source
          Child
          Systematic Review
          Meta Analysis
          Medline
          CINAHL Database
          Psycinfo
          Embase
          Cochrane Library
          Descriptive Statistics
          Confidence Intervals
          Child Behavior
          Behavioral Changes
          Mental Health
          Physical Performance
          Functional Status
          Attention
          Self Concept
          Cognition
          Motor Skills
          Social Skills
          Socialization
          Social Behavior
          Anxiety Prevention and Control
          Depression Prevention and Control
          Child: 6-12 years
      ab: Background: Animal‐assisted interventions (AAIs) have emerged as a promising nonpharmacological intervention option for children diagnosed with attention‐deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). However, recent systematic reviews have been primarily narrative. Additionally, the pooled effectiveness of AAIs was absent from these systematic reviews. Methods: We conducted a comprehensive systematic review and meta‐analysis, searching multiple databases, including Web of Science, MEDLINE, CINAHL, Scopus, PsycINFO, EMBASE and Cochrane, from inception of the databases to March 2024. We retrieved 17 randomised controlled trials or quasi‐experimental studies and used Review Manager 5.4.1 software to perform a meta‐analysis of the effects of AAIs in treating children with ADHD. We conducted a set of random‐effects meta‐analyses to estimate standardised mean differences (SMD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) using subgroup data by different outcome domains extracted from eight randomised controlled trials, in relation to changes in behavioural, mental and physical functioning in a total of 307 children with ADHD before and after the intervention. Results: In comparison with non‐AAI groups, AAIs significantly improved attention problems in children with ADHD (SMD = −0.42, 95% CI = −0.71 to −0.13), self‐esteem (0.46, 0.14 to 0.78), learning and cognition problems (−0.69, −0.98 to −0.39) and motor proficiency (0.77, 0.11 to 1.42). The pooled effect of AAIs on the severity of ADHD symptoms in the experimental group was not significantly different from the effect of conventional treatments in the control group (0.10, −0.31 to 0.52). Similarly, AAIs had no significant positive effects on social interaction (−0.22, −0.51 to 0.06), social skills (−0.32, −0.87 to 0.24), problematic behaviours (−0.10, −0.54 to 0.35) or emotional problems, including depression and anxiety (−0.13, −0.51 to 0.24). Conclusions: As an ADHD management strategy complementary to gold‐standard approaches, such as medication or multimodal interventions, AAIs did not appear to be more effective in improving the majority of core ADHD outcomes in children. Future studies should incorporate rigorous study designs with large sample sizes and a standard protocol to achieve more valid and reliable conclusion.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        meta analysis
        research
        systematic review
        tables/charts
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N