Ecological Analysis of Technology Use Among Children in Collaborative Design Contexts.

Background: In this paper, we extend findings from previous iterations of a design‐based project called ThinkerSpaces design studios that promotes human‐centred design among children. ThinkerSpaces design studios is a play‐based afterschool club that follows principles of embedded design by prioriti...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Journal of Computer Assisted Learning Vol. 41; no. 2; pp. 1 - 23
Autores principales: Toprani, Dhvani, Borge, Marcela
Formato: pictorial research tables/charts Journal Article
Publicado: Wiley-Blackwell Apr2025
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=184016296&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 184016296
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        02664909
        6M1
      jtl: Journal of Computer Assisted Learning
      issn: 02664909
      maglogo: Y
    pubinfo:
      dt: Apr2025
      vid: 41
      iid: 2
      pid: 480
      pub: Wiley-Blackwell
      place: Malden, Massachusetts
    artinfo:
      ui:
        184016296
        184016296
        184016296
        10.1111/jcal.13119
        184016296
      ppf: 1
      ppct: 22
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: Ecological Analysis of Technology Use Among Children in Collaborative Design Contexts.
      aug:
        au:
          Toprani, Dhvani
          Borge, Marcela
        affil: Teaching and Learning Technologies, Elon University,, USA
      sug:
        subj:
          Technology Utilization
          Collaboration
          Learning
          Human
          Male
          Female
          Child
          Ecological Research
          Comparative Studies
          Learning Environment
          Multimethod Studies
          Conceptual Framework
          Descriptive Statistics
          United States
          Child: 6-12 years
          Male
          Female
      ab: Background: In this paper, we extend findings from previous iterations of a design‐based project called ThinkerSpaces design studios that promotes human‐centred design among children. ThinkerSpaces design studios is a play‐based afterschool club that follows principles of embedded design by prioritising learner agency, exploration and ongoing reflection for the purpose of improvement. Methods: In this study, we wanted to examine the difference in collaborative interactions across different technological conditions and the learning outcomes these conditions provided. Thus, we created three comparative technology conditions, that is, physical, screen and mixed technologies, each of which represented a collaborative learning environment dominated by a particular kind of technology. We ran three different sections of the club to vary these technology conditions and control when we introduced them. We use a mixed‐methods approach to analyse the data and capture distinct aspects of the learning ecology to understand the following questions: (RQ1) How do collaborative interactions differ as young learners engage with different technologies; and (RQ2) What does productive and unproductive talk looked like across conditions and what learning opportunities do they provide. Our population included 36 third to seventh grade learners enrolled across three club section. Learners were placed into four triads in each section for a period of 14–18 weeks. Findings: We found that physical technologies produced the most productive talk, followed by the mixed technology condition. Screen‐based technologies produced the most unproductive talk. However, when we further investigated unproductive talk, we discovered that unproductive talk supported different forms of agency and creativity that facilitated learners' ability to develop digital fluency. Students also learned how to regulate collaborative activity around technology. We use these findings to propose changes in technology integration approaches in teaching and learning. Contribution: We end the paper by proposing a collective technology integration framework that helps facilitators design learning environments that promote learner agency in the process of technology integration.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        pictorial
        research
        tables/charts
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N