Differences in Learning Across the Lifespan Emerge via Resource-Rational Computations.

Learning accurate beliefs about the world is computationally demanding but critical for adaptive behavior across the lifespan. Here, we build on an established framework formalizing learning as predictive inference and examine the possibility that age differences in learning emerge from efficient co...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Psychological Review Vol. 132; no. 3; pp. 556 - 581
Autores principales: Bruckner, Rasmus, Nassar, Matthew R., Li, Shu-Chen, Eppinger, Ben
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: American Psychological Association Apr2025
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=184341953&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ssf
    uiTerm: 184341953
    longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson)
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        0033295X
        PYV
      jtl: Psychological Review
      issn: 0033295X
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Apr2025
      vid: 132
      iid: 3
      pid: 34
      pub: American Psychological Association
    artinfo:
      ui:
        184341953
        10.1037/rev0000526
      ppf: 556
      ppct: 25
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: Differences in Learning Across the Lifespan Emerge via Resource-Rational Computations.
      aug:
        au:
          Bruckner, Rasmus
          Nassar, Matthew R.
          Li, Shu-Chen
          Eppinger, Ben
        affil:
          Department of Education and Psychology, Freie Universität Berlin
          Institute of Psychology, University of Hamburg
          Department of Neuroscience, Brown University
          Robert J. and Nancy D. Carney Institute for Brain Science, Brown University
          Centre for Tactile Internet With Human-in-the-Loop, Technische Universität Dresden
          Faculty of Psychology, Technische Universität Dresden
          Department of Psychology, Concordia University
          Department of Psychology, University of Greifswald
      su:
        Learning
        Age
        Cognitive load
        Inference (Logic)
        Cognitive psychology
        Anchoring effect
        Cognitive bias
        Sampling (Process)
      sug:
        subj:
          Learning
          Age
          Cognitive load
          Inference (Logic)
          Cognitive psychology
          Anchoring effect
          Cognitive bias
          Sampling (Process)
      keyword:
        aging
        decision making
        development
        learning
        uncertainty
        aging
        decision making
        development
        learning
        uncertainty
      ab: Learning accurate beliefs about the world is computationally demanding but critical for adaptive behavior across the lifespan. Here, we build on an established framework formalizing learning as predictive inference and examine the possibility that age differences in learning emerge from efficient computations that consider available cognitive resources differing across the lifespan. In our resource-rational model, beliefs are updated through a sampling process that stops after reaching a criterion level of accuracy. The sampling process navigates a trade-off between belief accuracy and computational cost, with more samples favoring belief accuracy and fewer samples minimizing costs. When cognitive resources are limited or costly, a maximization of the accuracy–cost ratio requires a more frugal sampling policy, which leads to systematically biased beliefs. Data from two lifespan studies (N = 129 and N = 90) and one study in younger adults (N = 94) show that children and older adults display biases characteristic of a more frugal sampling policy. This is reflected in (a) more frequent perseveration when participants are required to update from previous beliefs and (b) a stronger anchoring bias when updating beliefs from an externally generated value. These results are qualitatively consistent with simulated predictions of our resource-rational model, corroborating the assumption that the identified biases originate from sampling. Our model and results provide a unifying perspective on perseverative and anchoring biases, show that they can jointly emerge from efficient belief-updating computations, and suggest that resource-rational adjustments of sampling computations can explain age-related changes in adaptive learning.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: N
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N