On the place of educational theory in the professional development of clinical educators.

Different views exist about the training needs of new clinical educators and how they might be met. This contributes to the variably of early professional development offerings. One area of contention concerns the value of educational theory. A paper published in this journal questioned the importan...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Education for Primary Care Vol. 36; no. 3; pp. 64 - 68
Autor principal: Clement, Tim
Formato: Journal Article
Publicado: Taylor & Francis Ltd May2025
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=184864759&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 184864759
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        14739879
        NAK
      jtl: Education for Primary Care
      issn: 14739879
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: May2025
      vid: 36
      iid: 3
      pid: 377
      pub: Taylor & Francis Ltd
      place: Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
    artinfo:
      ui:
        184864759
        183746771
        10.1080/14739879.2025.2475348
        184864759
      ppf: 64
      ppct: 4
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: On the place of educational theory in the professional development of clinical educators.
      aug:
        au: Clement, Tim
        affil: Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
      sug:
        subj:
          Family Practice Education
          Education, Clinical
          Faculty, Medical Education
          Faculty Development
          Educational Theory
          Staff Development
          Physicians, Family
          Theory-Practice Relationship
          Teaching
          Job Experience
      ab: Different views exist about the training needs of new clinical educators and how they might be met. This contributes to the variably of early professional development offerings. One area of contention concerns the value of educational theory. A paper published in this journal questioned the importance of educational theory in delivering effective GP training and the authors claimed that they had been unable to find an explicit exploration of this issue. If we look to another field – teacher training – the place of educational theory has been thoroughly explored. Leading teacher educators have reported how unsuccessful the 'theory-first' approach has been in influencing teachers' practice and improving pupils' education. 'Realistic teacher education' is proposed as an alternative, which starts from student teachers' practical experiences and the needs and concerns that arise from them. This 'theory-later' approach has influenced novel forms of professional development for clinical educators, where theory is introduced if it is perceived as being relevant to the teaching and learning problems under discussion. This requires facilitators who are comfortable in working from practice to theory. Forsaking a 'theory-first' approach in foundational courses should not make educational theory disappear but prompts course designers to ask if it is better placed in subsequent professional development offerings when clinical educators have had some teaching experience.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N