| Sumario: | Challenge-based funding approaches for allocating public research funds are generally well-understood. However, whether the funded research groups' projects are affected by the specific characteristics of grand challenges remains unclear. Anecdotally, some scholars have suggested that such challenges are ill-defined, complex and multidimensional, akin to a 'wicked problem'. In this study, we use a wicked problem perspective to investigate whether a challenge-based approach to funding could exhibit wicked problem characteristics, and the implications of managing this funding approach if it has these characteristics. Through a qualitative content analysis of the artefacts related to New Zealand's National Science Challenges, we show that challenges have a varying degree of semblance to wicked problems. Further, managing these challenges requires collaborative and engagement-centred practices that focus on pivoting, flexible resource allocation, 'best XI' team selection and soft skills development. This study contributes to conversations surrounding the design and management of challenge-based scientific funding policy through a wicked problem lens.
|
|---|