Analytics of Self‐Regulated Learning in Learning Analytics Feedback Processes: Associations With Feedback Literacy in Secondary Education.

Background: A key skill for self‐regulated learners is the ability to critically interpret and act on feedback—key components of feedback literacy. Yet, the connection between feedback literacy and self‐regulated learning (SRL) remains underexplored, particularly in terms of how different levels of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Journal of Computer Assisted Learning Vol. 41; no. 4; pp. 1 - 16
Autores principales: Jin, Flora Ji‐Yoon, Nath, Debarshi, Guan, Rui, Li, Tongguang, Li, Xinyu, Mello, Rafael Ferreira, Rodrigues, Luiz, Junior, Cleon Pereira, Abuzayyad‐Nuseibeh, Heba, Raković, Mladen, Martinez‐Maldonado, Roberto, Gašević, Dragan, Tsai, Yi‐Shan
Formato: pictorial research tables/charts Journal Article
Publicado: Wiley-Blackwell Aug2025
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=186918272&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 186918272
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        02664909
        6M1
      jtl: Journal of Computer Assisted Learning
      issn: 02664909
      maglogo: Y
    pubinfo:
      dt: Aug2025
      vid: 41
      iid: 4
      pid: 480
      pub: Wiley-Blackwell
      place: Malden, Massachusetts
    artinfo:
      ui:
        186918272
        186918272
        186918272
        10.1111/jcal.70076
        186918272
      ppf: 1
      ppct: 15
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: Analytics of Self‐Regulated Learning in Learning Analytics Feedback Processes: Associations With Feedback Literacy in Secondary Education.
      aug:
        au:
          Jin, Flora Ji‐Yoon
          Nath, Debarshi
          Guan, Rui
          Li, Tongguang
          Li, Xinyu
          Mello, Rafael Ferreira
          Rodrigues, Luiz
          Junior, Cleon Pereira
          Abuzayyad‐Nuseibeh, Heba
          Raković, Mladen
          Martinez‐Maldonado, Roberto
          Gašević, Dragan
          Tsai, Yi‐Shan
        affil: Department of Human Centred Computing, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
      sug:
        subj:
          Students, High School Psychosocial Factors
          Self Regulation
          Learning Methods
          Feedback
          Writing
          Task Performance and Analysis
          Human
          Funding Source
          Brazil
          United Arab Emirates
          India
          Australia
          Self Report
          Cluster Analysis
          Descriptive Statistics
          Child
          Adolescence
          Summated Rating Scaling
          Logistic Regression
          Mann-Whitney U Test
          T-Tests
          Child: 6-12 years
          Adolescent: 13-18 years
      ab: Background: A key skill for self‐regulated learners is the ability to critically interpret and act on feedback—key components of feedback literacy. Yet, the connection between feedback literacy and self‐regulated learning (SRL) remains underexplored, particularly in terms of how different levels of feedback literacy influence SRL processes in authentic learning contexts. Objectives: This study aimed to investigate the interplay between feedback literacy and SRL processes among secondary school students while working on a multi‐source writing task using an online learning analytics (LA) platform. Methods: The study involved 99 secondary school students from multiple nations (Brazil, UAE, India, and Australia) engaged in multi‐source writing tasks. Students received personalised scaffolding feedback designed to enhance their SRL processes. Using K‐medoids clustering, students were grouped based on their self‐reported feedback literacy levels. Ordered Network Analysis (ONA) was employed to visualise and analyse trace data from the learning analytics platform, revealing SRL strategies across different feedback literacy profiles. Results and Conclusions: Analysis of data from the 99 participants revealed two distinct feedback literacy groups with different SRL patterns. Proactive Feedback Engagers (n = 55) initially showed less effective SRL strategies but demonstrated significant improvement after receiving scaffolding interventions, adopting more balanced and adaptive regulation processes. In contrast, Moderate Feedback Engagers (n = 48) began with a more strategic approach but showed less adaptability as the task progressed, diverging from suggested SRL processes. These findings imply the need for more adaptive scaffolding approaches based on students' feedback literacy levels, highlighting the importance of tailored support in developing learning strategies based on different levels of feedback literacy.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        pictorial
        research
        tables/charts
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N