On Explaining Temporally Asymmetric Experiences.

Ismael aims for an understanding of the nature of an embedded perspective of agents in a world. If successful, this would explain a cluster of ways in which from an embedded perspective, we experience the world in an array of temporally asymmetric ways. Moreover, these are ways that have led many ph...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Australasian Philosophical Review Vol. 8; no. 3; pp. 243 - 252
Autores principales: Braddon-Mitchell, David, Miller, Kristie
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Taylor & Francis Ltd Sep2024
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
Descripción
Sumario:Ismael aims for an understanding of the nature of an embedded perspective of agents in a world. If successful, this would explain a cluster of ways in which from an embedded perspective, we experience the world in an array of temporally asymmetric ways. Moreover, these are ways that have led many philosophers to rather metaphysically inflationary views about the nature of time, according to which time itself really is dynamical, and is characterized by the movement of an objectively (i.e., non-perspectival) present. Ismael aims to explain these features of our experience without positing any such metaphysical picture. She argues that there are constraints which prevent us from taking this Olympian conception of the world and our place in it, and that these, jointly, explain why we experience the world in these temporally asymmetric ways. We take up two related questions. First, what it would mean to say that these constraints are not merely epistemic, and second, how far these constraints get us in explaining why we experience the world in these ways.