Diagnostic performance of apparent diffusion coefficient values in differentiating benign from malignant lesions in prostate PI-RADS v2.1 category 1 "nodules in nodule".

Objectives: To explore the associations between the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values of prostate PI-RADS v2.1 category 1 "nodules in nodule" and their pathological characteristics. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the prostate images from 226 male patients who underwent biopsy followi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Abdominal Radiology Vol. 50; no. 11; pp. 5292 - 5305
Autores principales: Sun, Minghua, Li, Fei, Zhang, Xiaoyan, Wu, Rui, Liu, Wenya, Xu, Li, Wu, Mengjie, Wang, Yangang
Formato: Journal Article
Publicado: Springer Nature Nov2025
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
Descripción
Sumario:Objectives: To explore the associations between the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values of prostate PI-RADS v2.1 category 1 "nodules in nodule" and their pathological characteristics. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the prostate images from 226 male patients who underwent biopsy following MRI from January 2019 to December 2024. Two radiologists evaluated the PI-RADS v2.1 categories of identified nodules, measured the ADC values of the prostate nodules in a double-blind manner, and analyzed the associations between these values and the pathological characteristics of the nodules via independent sample t tests or Mann-Whitney U test. Results: The ADC values of PI-RADS v2.1 category 1 "nodules in nodule" pathologically confirmed as clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) were lower than those of benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH) ((unit in ×10− 3 mm2/s)TZ: 0.739 ± 0.15 versus 0.984 ± 0.24; PZ: 0.719 ± 0.17 versus 1.036 ± 0.21, p < 0.001). The AUCs were 0.799 (TZ) with a cutoff of 0.835 × 10− 3mm2/s, and 0.873(PZ) with a cutoff of 0.795 × 10− 3mm2/s, respectively. The total prostate-specific antigen (tPSA), free/t PSA, PSA density (PSAD), and prostate gland volume (PGV) differed significantly between patients with PI-RADS v2.1 "nodules in nodule" that were pathologically confirmed as csPCa and patients with BPH (all p < 0.05). Conclusion: In patients with PI-RADS v2.1 category 1 "nodules in nodule", when the ADC values are less than 0.835 × 10− 3mm2/s in the TZ, the PI-RADS v2.1 score of the nodule can be upgraded to 3.