Downstream consequences of collaborative recall: Testing the influence on new learning and protection of original learning.

Collaboration influences memory during group recall (e.g., collaborative inhibition) and downstream, impacting individual recall (e.g., retrieval gains) and memory convergence (e.g., collective memory) following the interaction. The current study tested the scope of this downstream reach as we exami...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Memory & Cognition Vol. 53; no. 8; pp. 2655 - 2674
Main Authors: Greeley, Garrett D., Rajaram, Suparna
Format: Article
Published: Springer Nature Nov2025
Subjects:
Online Access:View this record in EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=189934417&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ssf
    uiTerm: 189934417
    longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson)
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        0090502X
        MEG
      jtl: Memory & Cognition
      issn: 0090502X
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Nov2025
      vid: 53
      iid: 8
      pid: 237
      pub: Springer Nature
    artinfo:
      ui:
        189934417
        10.3758/s13421-025-01730-z
      ppf: 2655
      ppct: 19
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
              size: 1006KB
      tig:
        atl: Downstream consequences of collaborative recall: Testing the influence on new learning and protection of original learning.
      aug:
        au:
          Greeley, Garrett D.
          Rajaram, Suparna
        affil: https://ror.org/05qghxh33 Department of Psychology, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA
      su:
        Interprofessional relations
        Task performance
        Learning
        Memory
        College students
        Group process
        Research funding
        T-test (Statistics)
        Descriptive statistics
        Data analysis software
        Learning strategies
        Regression analysis
      sug:
        subj:
          Interprofessional relations
          Task performance
          Learning
          Memory
          College students
          Group process
          Research funding
          T-test (Statistics)
          Descriptive statistics
          Data analysis software
          Learning strategies
          Regression analysis
      keyword:
        Collaboration
        Collective memory
        Intrusions
        New learning
        Psychology and Cognitive Sciences Psychology
        Source-monitoring
        Testing effects
        Collaboration
        Collective memory
        Intrusions
        New learning
        Psychology and Cognitive Sciences Psychology
        Source-monitoring
        Testing effects
      ab: Collaboration influences memory during group recall (e.g., collaborative inhibition) and downstream, impacting individual recall (e.g., retrieval gains) and memory convergence (e.g., collective memory) following the interaction. The current study tested the scope of this downstream reach as we examined whether prior collaborative recall, compared with individual recall, improves subsequent learning. Further, we assessed whether group recall protects original learning—that is, if collaboration helps individuals distinguish learning episodes and if postcollaborative effects persist even as new learning occurs. In two experiments, participants worked individually or in collaborative groups to recall a word list. Next, participants studied a new list of words that were semantically related to the original list before recalling the most recently studied list (noncumulative recall; Experiment 1) or both lists (cumulative recall; Experiment 2). Interestingly, collaborative and individual retrieval influenced subsequent learning of new material similarly. However, collaboration protected original learning; former collaborators recalled fewer prior-list intrusions (Experiment 1), and they were better at identifying when words appeared on the original list (Experiment 2). Moreover, postcollaborative retrieval gains and collective memory for the originally studied material persisted as new learning occurred (Experiment 2). These novel findings suggest that while collaborative retrieval may not readily improve subsequent learning compared with individual retrieval, group recall confers a downstream source-monitoring advantage and postcollaboration effects are resilient in the face of subsequent learning. We discuss how these findings align with relevant theoretical accounts that emphasize the importance of contextual dynamics and highlight the potential for more applied research on this topic.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: N
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N