Epistemically Vicious Knowledge.

I will present a novel argument that there can be epistemically vicious knowledge. In the kind of case that interests me, the subject knows not despite but rather because of her vice. It is generally agreed that some kinds of epistemic luck doesn't undermine knowledge. For instance, being lucky not...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Erkenntnis Vol. 90; no. 8; pp. 3293 - 3311
Main Author: Paulson, Spencer
Format: Article
Published: Springer Nature Dec2025
Subjects:
Online Access:View this record in EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=190357304&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 190357304
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        01650106
        5KZ
      jtl: Erkenntnis
      issn: 01650106
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Dec2025
      vid: 90
      iid: 8
      pid: 237
      pub: Springer Nature
    artinfo:
      ui:
        190357304
        10.1007/s10670-024-00855-y
      ppf: 3293
      ppct: 18
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
              size: 967KB
      tig:
        atl: Epistemically Vicious Knowledge.
      aug:
        au: Paulson, Spencer
        affil: https://ror.org/000e0be47 Northwestern University, Kresge Hall 3512, 1880 Campus Drive, 60208, Evanston, IL, USA
      su:
        Justification (Theory of knowledge)
        Theory of knowledge
        Evidentialism
      sug:
        subj:
          Justification (Theory of knowledge)
          Theory of knowledge
          Evidentialism
      keyword:
        Epistemic Luck
        Epistemic Vice
        Moral Luck
        Virtue Epistemology
      ab: I will present a novel argument that there can be epistemically vicious knowledge. In the kind of case that interests me, the subject knows not despite but rather because of her vice. It is generally agreed that some kinds of epistemic luck doesn't undermine knowledge. For instance, being lucky not to have misleading evidence doesn't undermine knowledge. I will argue that this doesn't change when the avoidance of misleading evidence depends on the subject's vice. It does not prevent her belief from being both safe and sensitive, nor does it have any bearing on whether her justifying reasons are ultimately defeated. To illustrate my point, I will draw a parallel with a certain way of thinking about resultant moral luck. I will then go on to consider the ramifications for virtue-theoretic analyses of knowledge and the doctrine of normative defeat.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: Erkenntnis is a copyright of Springer, 2025. All Rights Reserved.
      item: Erkenntnis
      holder: Springer Nature
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2025
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N