청소년의 재난으로 인한 간접 외상 경험과 간접 외상 중재 프로그램 요구: 포커스 그룹 인터뷰 연구

Purpose: This study explored adolescents' experiences of indirect trauma related to disasters and identified program needs from the perspectives of adolescents and school health teachers. Methods: Focus group interviews were conducted with 12 adolescents and 12 school health teachers from May to Jul...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Journal of Korean Academy of Psychiatric & Mental Health Nursing (JKPMHN) Vol. 34; no. 4; pp. 494 - 506
Autor principal: Suyon, Baek
Formato: research tables/charts Journal Article
Publicado: Korean Academy of Psychiatric & Mental Health Nursing Dec2025
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
Descripción
Sumario:Purpose: This study explored adolescents' experiences of indirect trauma related to disasters and identified program needs from the perspectives of adolescents and school health teachers. Methods: Focus group interviews were conducted with 12 adolescents and 12 school health teachers from May to July 2025, and data were analyzed using Braun and Clarke's thematic analysis. Results: Four themes with twelve categories emerged. Theme 1 described adolescents' indirect trauma experiences, including emotional shock, suppressed emotional expression, and identification with victims shaped by social interpretations of disaster. Theme 2 addressed support systems and coping, noting the duality of supportive and hurtful relationships, gaps in teachers' recognition, and avoidance as psychological blocking. Theme 3 reflected possibilities for posttraumatic growth, such as behavioral changes to prepare for risks and reappraisal of life and relationships. Theme 4 outlined intervention needs, highlighting awareness of indirect trauma, emotional expression supported by practical strategies and media literacy, informal and comfortable participation formats, and easy-to-use programs for teachers. Conclusion: Indirect trauma among adolescents is a significant mental health concern requiring school-based interventions. Programs should balance adolescents' needs for safe, practical support with teachers' requirements for feasible implementation, and further research should develop tailored interventions that foster posttraumatic growth.