Personalizmas ir ekologija: Roberto Spaemanno antropomorfizmo reabilitavimas.
The paper presents the argument that Spaemann's ecological thought is grounded in his attempt to find an alternative to the problems which he sees as originating in the rejection of teleological understanding of human beings and nature. The paper argues that Spaemann's ethical personalism and reflec...
| Publicado en: | Problems / Problemos Vol. 108; pp. 48 - 63 |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Vilnius University
2025
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| Sumario: | The paper presents the argument that Spaemann's ecological thought is grounded in his attempt to find an alternative to the problems which he sees as originating in the rejection of teleological understanding of human beings and nature. The paper argues that Spaemann's ethical personalism and reflections on ecological problems are not two separate fragments of his philosophy, which have no clearer relation. A personalist perspective is inseparable from Spaemann's efforts to rehabilitate anthropomorphisms, which he sees as a necessary condition for the establishment of ethical relationship with nature. The paper defends the thesis that philosopher's attempt to rehabilitate anthropomorphisms is the link which connects his ecological and personalist ethics. The personalist perspective marks an attempt to find an alternative to the ever-intensifying domination of modern anthropocentrism, which is characterised by an inability to grasp the reality of person and nature. Straipsnio tikslas -- įrodyti, kad Spaemanno ekologinę mintį grindžia pastanga rasti alternatyvą jo diagnozuotoms problemoms, kylančioms iš teleologinio žmogaus ir gamtos supratimo atsisakymo. Įrodinėjama, kad personalistinė etika ir svarstymai apie ekologines problemas nėra atskiri, aiškesnio ryšio neturintys jo filosofijos fragmentai. Personalistinė perspektyva ir nuo jos neatsiejama pastanga reabilituoti antropomor- fizmus Spaemanno suprantamos kaip būtinos etinio santykio su gamtine tikrove sąlygos. Straipsnyje ginama pozicija, kad filosofo siekis reabilituoti antropomorfinį tikrovės supratimą, yra jungtis, vienijanti jo ekologinę ir personalistinę etiką. Personalistinė perspektyva reiškia pastangą rasti alternatyvą modernybės raidoje vis intensyviau dominuojančiam antropocentrizmui, kuriam būdingas asmens ir gamtos tikroviškumo praradimas. |
|---|