Correlation between task-based checklists and global rating scores in undergraduate objective structured clinical examinations in Saudi Arabia: a 1-year comparative study.

Purpose: This study investigated the correlation between task-based checklist scores and global rating scores (GRS) in objective structured clinical examinations (OSCEs) for fourth-year undergraduate medical students and aimed to determine whether both methods can be reliably used in a standard sett...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions Vol. 22; pp. 1 - 8
Autores principales: Khan, Uzma, Khan, Yasir Naseem
Formato: pictorial research tables/charts Journal Article
Publicado: National Health Personnel Licensing Examination Board 2025
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=192170954&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 192170954
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        19755937
        B0CC
      jtl: Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions
      issn: 19755937
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: 2025
      vid: 22
      pid: 58691
      pub: National Health Personnel Licensing Examination Board
    artinfo:
      ui:
        192170954
        192170954
        192170954
        10.3352/jeehp.2025.22.19
        192170954
      ppf: 1
      ppct: 7
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
      tig:
        atl: Correlation between task-based checklists and global rating scores in undergraduate objective structured clinical examinations in Saudi Arabia: a 1-year comparative study.
      aug:
        au:
          Khan, Uzma
          Khan, Yasir Naseem
        affil: Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Medicine, Al Rayan National Colleges, Medina Al-Munawara, Saudi Arabia
      sug:
        subj:
          Education, Clinical
          Educational Measurement
          Credentialing Examinations Methods
          Student Performance Appraisal
          Students, Medical Saudi Arabia
          Students, Undergraduate
          Task Performance and Analysis Methods
          Checklists Evaluation
          Scales Evaluation
          Human
          Comparative Studies
          Correlational Studies
          Computerized Educational Testing
          Saudi Arabia
          Male
          Female
          Nonexperimental Studies
          Academic Medical Centers
          Family Practice Education
          Clinical Competence Evaluation
          Competency Assessment
          Descriptive Statistics
          Data Analysis Software
          Spearman's Rank Correlation Coefficient
          Power Analysis
          Male
          Female
      ab: Purpose: This study investigated the correlation between task-based checklist scores and global rating scores (GRS) in objective structured clinical examinations (OSCEs) for fourth-year undergraduate medical students and aimed to determine whether both methods can be reliably used in a standard setting. Methods: A comparative observational study was conducted at Al Rayan College of Medicine, Saudi Arabia, involving 93 fourth-year students during the 2023-2024 academic year. OSCEs from 2 General Practice courses were analyzed, each comprising 10 stations assessing clinical competencies. Students were scored using both task-specific checklists and holistic 5-point GRS. Reliability was evaluated using Cronbach's α, and the relationship between the 2 scoring methods was assessed using the coefficient of determination (R²). Ethical approval and informed consent were obtained. Results: The mean OSCE score was 76.7 in Course 1 (Cronbach's α=0.85) and 73.0 in Course 2 (Cronbach's α=0.81). R² values varied by station and competency. Strong correlations were observed in procedural and management skills (R² up to 0.87), while weaker correlations appeared in history-taking stations (R² as low as 0.35). The variability across stations highlighted the context-dependence of alignment between checklist and GRS methods. Conclusion: Both checklists and GRS exhibit reliable psychometric properties. Their combined use improves validity in OSCE scoring, but station-specific application is recommended. Checklists may anchor pass/fail decisions, while GRS may assist in assessing borderline performance. This hybrid model increases fairness and reflects clinical authenticity in competency-based assessment.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        pictorial
        research
        tables/charts
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N