Social work students' reflection about conducting child welfare assessment in a guided case-based learning environment.

To teach about child welfare assessments, social work educators frequently draw on the use of authentic or fictitious cases from social work practice. Such cases provide the opportunity of bridging the theory-practice gap. However, they can be overwhelming given the vast amount of information presen...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Social Work Education Vol. 45; no. 2; pp. 288 - 306
Autores principales: Opio-Göres, Mary, Kollar, Ingo, Dorner, Birgit
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Taylor & Francis Ltd Mar2026
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=192312154&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ssf
    uiTerm: 192312154
    longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson)
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        02615479
        36Q
      jtl: Social Work Education
      issn: 02615479
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Mar2026
      vid: 45
      iid: 2
      pid: 377
      pub: Taylor & Francis Ltd
    artinfo:
      ui:
        192312154
        10.1080/02615479.2024.2443493
      ppf: 288
      ppct: 18
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
              size: 385KB
      tig:
        atl: Social work students' reflection about conducting child welfare assessment in a guided case-based learning environment.
      aug:
        au:
          Opio-Göres, Mary
          Kollar, Ingo
          Dorner, Birgit
        affil:
          International Doctoral School REASON, Department of Psychology, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, Germany
          Faculty of Philosophy and Social Sciences, University of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
          Department of Social Work, Catholic University of Applied Science Munich, München, Germany
      su:
        Child welfare
        Content analysis
        Two-way communication
        Social work education
        Case-based reasoning
        Facilitated learning
        Metacognition
      sug:
        subj:
          Child welfare
          Content analysis
          Two-way communication
          Social work education
          Other Individual and Family Services
          Case-based reasoning
          Facilitated learning
          Metacognition
      keyword:
        Assessment
        case-based learning
        child welfare
        computer supported scripts
        metacognitive prompts
        social work education
        Assessment
        case-based learning
        child welfare
        computer supported scripts
        metacognitive prompts
        social work education
      ab: To teach about child welfare assessments, social work educators frequently draw on the use of authentic or fictitious cases from social work practice. Such cases provide the opportunity of bridging the theory-practice gap. However, they can be overwhelming given the vast amount of information presented. Additional support is warranted when teaching with cases. In this article, we investigate how students reflect about their learning experience conducting child welfare assessment in a guided case-based learning (GCBL) environment. A qualitative content analysis of written responses of N = 70 social work students from five different universities in Bavaria (Germany) examined implicit and explicit meanings of elements of the learning environment that students paid attention to, what elements they perceived as helpful or hindering, and what factors they attributed difficulty to. Results revealed that the GCBL environment was well received. Features integrated into the GCBL environment helped students to focus on important steps of an assessment. Nonetheless, some students perceived breaking down the exercise into smaller elements as an interference of their problem-solving process. We argue that the potential of GCBL can be improved by paying attention to instruction clarity and by incorporating possibilities of interaction and feedback.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: N
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N