Multiple inequalities in every meal: theorizing the intersectional erasure of food producers both past and present.

In hierarchical societies across diverse cultures and time periods, food producers are often made invisible for the purpose of enhancing the prestige of tastemakers in their respective societies. Engaging Intersectionality theory with the history, anthropology, and archaeology of foodways can elucid...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Food, Culture & Society Vol. 29; no. 2; pp. 422 - 453
Autores principales: Chiou, Katherine L., Hu, Di, Quave, Kylie E., Rivera Prince, Jordi A., Warnes, Andrew, Williams-Forson, Psyche, Brunache, Peggy, Bardolph, Dana N., Fedoroff, Michael P.
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Taylor & Francis Ltd Apr2026
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=192371305&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ssf
    uiTerm: 192371305
    longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson)
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        15528014
        1GVA
      jtl: Food, Culture & Society
      issn: 15528014
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Apr2026
      vid: 29
      iid: 2
      pid: 377
      pub: Taylor & Francis Ltd
    artinfo:
      ui:
        192371305
        10.1080/15528014.2025.2526299
      ppf: 422
      ppct: 31
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
              size: 7.6MB
      tig:
        atl: Multiple inequalities in every meal: theorizing the intersectional erasure of food producers both past and present.
      aug:
        au:
          Chiou, Katherine L.
          Hu, Di
          Quave, Kylie E.
          Rivera Prince, Jordi A.
          Warnes, Andrew
          Williams-Forson, Psyche
          Brunache, Peggy
          Bardolph, Dana N.
          Fedoroff, Michael P.
        affil:
          Department of Anthropology, The University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL, USA
          Department of Sociology and Anthropology, James Madison University, Harrisonburg, VA, USA
          University Writing Program and Department of Anthropology, The George Washington University, Washington, DC, USA
          Department of Anthropology, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
          School of English, University of Leeds, Leeds, England
          Department of American Studies, University of Maryland, College Park, USA
          School of Humanities, University of Glasgow, Scotland, UK
          Department of Anthropology, Northern Illinois University, DeKalb, IL, USA
          Alabama Water Institute, The University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL, USA
      su:
        Food production
        Prestige
        Social hierarchies
        Food habits
        Social stratification
        Intersectionality
        Anthropology
        Archaeology
      sug:
        subj:
          Food production
          Prestige
          Social hierarchies
          Food habits
          Social stratification
          Intersectionality
          Anthropology
          Archaeology
      keyword:
        archaeology
        food production
        inequalities
        labor
        archaeology
        food production
        inequalities
        labor
      ab: In hierarchical societies across diverse cultures and time periods, food producers are often made invisible for the purpose of enhancing the prestige of tastemakers in their respective societies. Engaging Intersectionality theory with the history, anthropology, and archaeology of foodways can elucidate how what we term "prestige-as-erasure" manifests in various social contexts. This paradoxical invisibility arises from food producers' labor underpinning the very foundations of culinary prestige, while that same labor remains devalued within global capitalist and precapitalist systems. Food producers' contributions are intentionally and unintentionally obscured—regardless of distance from origin to consumer—while tastemakers reap disproportionate credit. We engage examples from multiple continents and centuries to demonstrate that Intersectionality theory does not only apply to modern cases of racism and sexism. Instead, we use anthropology's cross-cultural comparative method to examine how food production and consumption can both bolster and challenge social hierarchies based on race, class, gender, ability, and other axes of identity and prestige/oppression. We demonstrate the potential of archaeology's contribution to food studies as well as the promise of intersectional approaches for those reconstructing and analyzing foodways across pertinent disciplines.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: N
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N