Integration of ChatGPT in medical learning: An analysis of interaction and contradictions.

Background: Current research on generative AI in medical education focuses on AI's performance or risks, such as unreliability. We argue these issues are not isolated flaws but are symptoms of systemic contradictions that emerge when a technology is introduced into a learning environment. To move be...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Medical Teacher Vol. 48; no. 6; pp. 1004 - 1012
Autores principales: Tai, Shih-Hsuan, Yeh, Chi-Chuan, Wang, Jann-Yuan, Hu, Rey-Heng, Lee, Po-Huang, Ho, Cheng-Maw
Formato: research tables/charts Journal Article
Publicado: Taylor & Francis Ltd Jun2026
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=193923653&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 193923653
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        0142159X
        MCH
      jtl: Medical Teacher
      issn: 0142159X
      maglogo: Y
    pubinfo:
      dt: Jun2026
      vid: 48
      iid: 6
      pid: 377
      pub: Taylor & Francis Ltd
      place: Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
    artinfo:
      ui:
        193923653
        190461441
        193923653
        193923653
        10.1080/0142159X.2025.2604245
        193923653
      ppf: 1004
      ppct: 8
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: Integration of ChatGPT in medical learning: An analysis of interaction and contradictions.
      aug:
        au:
          Tai, Shih-Hsuan
          Yeh, Chi-Chuan
          Wang, Jann-Yuan
          Hu, Rey-Heng
          Lee, Po-Huang
          Ho, Cheng-Maw
        affil: School of Medicine, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
      sug:
        subj:
          Artificial Intelligence, Generative Utilization
          Education, Medical
          Educational Technology
          Students, Medical
          Self-Directed Learning
          Student Experiences Evaluation
          User-Computer Interface
          Peer Group
          Interpersonal Relations
          Faculty, Medical
          Faculty-Student Relations
          Computer-Assisted Instruction
          Human
          Taiwan
          Qualitative Studies
          Schools, Medical
          Feedback
          Liver Failure, Acute Education
          Thematic Analysis
          Student Knowledge
          Rules and Regulations
          Confusion
          Educational Theory
          Conceptual Framework
          Students, Undergraduate
          Comparative Studies
          Descriptive Statistics
          Questionnaires
          Curriculum
          Cross Sectional Studies
          Data Analysis Software
          Clinical Competence
          Models, Educational
          Data Quality
          Natural Language Processing
          Learning Methods
          Misinformation
          Surgery, Operative Education
      ab: Background: Current research on generative AI in medical education focuses on AI's performance or risks, such as unreliability. We argue these issues are not isolated flaws but are symptoms of systemic contradictions that emerge when a technology is introduced into a learning environment. To move beyond descriptive reports, a theoretical framework is necessary to analyze the systemic tensions that arise during generative AI integration. Methods: A total of 141 first-year clerkship medical students used ChatGPT and provided qualitative data, including conversations with ChatGPT, evaluations of the generative AI's responses, and free-text feedback after watching concept videos of 'Acute Liver Failure'. We employed inductive thematic analysis to identify initial patterns, followed by a deductive analysis using Cultural-Historical Activity Theory to identify and interpret systemic contradictions. Results: The analysis revealed four contradictions within the activity system: 1) a conflict between the Tool's (ChatGPT's) unreliability and the Object of achieving accurate knowledge; 2) a skills gap between the Subject's (students') initial questioning abilities and the Tool's operational demand; 3) an unstable Division of Labor (student-AI) that conflicted with professional Rules, creating a demand for the need for expert validation; and 4) ambiguous Rules that created confusion and conflicted with professional norms. Conclusions: Challenges like AI unreliability and skill gaps are contradictions that function as catalysts for expansive learning. Resolving these tensions requires systemic transformation, including formalizing prompt engineering training and redefining the educator's role from an information provider to an essential expert validator within a new collaborative practice.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        research
        tables/charts
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N