Linking Words, Linking Minds: Conjunctions as Cognitive Markers of Critical Thinking in Indonesian Junior-High Essays.

In the contemporary information age, critical thinking is a vital competency for navigating complex, dynamic knowledge environments. This study examines how Indonesian junior-high students deploy conjunctions in descriptive essays and how these micro-linguistic choices index dimensions of critical t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:International Journal of Humanities Education Vol. 24; no. 1; pp. 71 - 98
Main Authors: Wahid, Abdul, Syamsuri, Andi Sukri, Muhsin, Muh. Arief, Rahim, Abd. Rahman, Hasrianti, Andi
Format: Article
Published: Common Ground Research Networks Jun2026
Subjects:
Online Access:View this record in EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=194661847&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 194661847
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        23270063
        HE57
      jtl: International Journal of Humanities Education
      issn: 23270063
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Jun2026
      vid: 24
      iid: 1
      pid: 22359
      pub: Common Ground Research Networks
    artinfo:
      ui:
        194661847
        10.18848/2327-0063/CGP/v24i01/71-97
      ppf: 71
      ppct: 27
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: Linking Words, Linking Minds: Conjunctions as Cognitive Markers of Critical Thinking in Indonesian Junior-High Essays.
      aug:
        au:
          Wahid, Abdul
          Syamsuri, Andi Sukri
          Muhsin, Muh. Arief
          Rahim, Abd. Rahman
          Hasrianti, Andi
        affil:
          University of Muhammadiyah Makassar, Indonesia
          Alauddin Islamic State University, Indonesia
      su:
        Critical thinking
        Conjunctions (Grammar)
        Teaching models
        Cognitive linguistics
        Essays
        Discourse analysis
        Literacy
      sug:
        subj:
          Critical thinking
          Conjunctions (Grammar)
          Teaching models
          Cognitive linguistics
          Essays
          Discourse analysis
          Literacy
      keyword:
        Conjunctions
        Critical Thinking
        Essay Writing
        Middle-School Students
      ab: In the contemporary information age, critical thinking is a vital competency for navigating complex, dynamic knowledge environments. This study examines how Indonesian junior-high students deploy conjunctions in descriptive essays and how these micro-linguistic choices index dimensions of critical thinking. Ninety-six Grade-VIII students at SMP Negeri 1 Balikpapan wrote essays under standardized classroom conditions; after plagiarism (<30%) and length (>100 words) screening, eightythree texts were analyzed. Using an iterative qualitative content analysis, conjunctions were coded as additive, adversative, causal, temporal, or conditional, and surrounding clausal units were mapped to ten critical-thinking categories. Inter-rater reliability on 20% of the corpus reached κ = 0.82. Information synthesis dominated (22.3%), followed by evaluation (16.0%) and cause-and-effect (14.9%); argument construction (9.6%), problem-solving (8.5%), exemplification (7.4%), analytical reasoning (6.4%), generalization (5.3%), aspirational expression (5.3%), and creativity (4.3%) comprised the remainder. To contextualize aggregate patterns, we report descriptive (non-inferential) subgroup summaries by writing proficiency (lower/medium/higher--27/28/28), which indicate monotonic increases in conjunction density and type--token ratio with proficiency. We interpret conjunction use as a candidate, context-sensitive indicator--a trace of cognitive organization--rather than a causal determinant, noting the limits of the singlesite, observational design. Pedagogically, the findings support an integrated framework that embeds explicit attention to conjunctions within genre-based writing and reasoning scaffolds (e.g., criteria-based evaluation, counterargument routines, reflective dialogue). Future work should triangulate these indicators with psychometric measures (e.g., Cornell Critical Thinking Test), extend to multimodal/genre-comparative analyses, and pursue longitudinal or multi-site designs to test generalizability.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2026
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N